New York limits judicial intrusion into arbitration awards, reflecting the core principles of finality, deference to arbitrators’ rulings, and the narrow grounds for vacatur under CPLR 7511.

By:  Jeffrey M. Haber In Badme v. AECOM , 2025 N.Y. Slip Op. 06640, (1st Dept. Dec. 02, 2025), plaintiff sued for age discrimination after termination, arguing the arbitration clause in his employment contract expired when the contract ended. The motion court held that the arbitration agreement remained enforceable, citing the contract’s broad arbitration clause and survival clause. The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed, emphasizing that the contract’s broad arbi

By:  Jeffrey M. Haber In Allen v. Fidelity Brokerage Servs. LLC , 2025 N.Y. Slip Op. 34169(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Oct. 30, 2025), plaintiff, the representative of her son’s estate, sought to vacate a FINRA arbitration award after claims alleging negligent oversight of speculative options trading were denied. The arbitration panel imposed $25,000 in sanctions for violating FINRA Rule 12209 by filing a parallel court action. Plaintiff argued the panel exceeded its authority

By:  Jeffrey M. Haber As we have noted in prior articles, New York has a “long and strong public policy favoring arbitration”. Indeed, New York “favors and encourages arbitration as a means of conserving the time and resources of the courts and the contracting parties.” “Therefore, New York courts interfere as little as possible with the freedom of consenting parties to submit disputes to arbitration.”   “Nonetheless, ‘ ike contract rights generally, a right to arbitration

By:  Jeffrey M. Haber Under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and Article 75 of New York’s Civil Practice Law and Rules (“CPLR”), an action should be dismissed or stayed, and the claims referred to arbitration when they are subject to a broad, mandatory arbitration provision in the parties’ governing agreement. The FAA provides that written agreements to arbitrate are “valid, irrevocable, and enforceable” and “places arbitration agreements ‘upon the same footing as other co

By: Jeffrey M. Haber In Bron v. Fritch , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 32439(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County July 12, 2024 ( here ), the court was asked to confirm an arbitration award, pursuant to CPLR 7510, stemming from various disputes between the owners of a company engaged in electrical contracting. As discussed below, the court confirmed the award .  The parties in Bron jointly owned E. Electric Contracting Inc. (“EEC”). Their respective duties and ownership interests were governed by

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Arbitration is an alternative form of dispute resolution where the parties voluntarily agree that a neutral person will resolve any legal disputes between them, instead of a judge or jury in a court of law. It is encouraged and recognized as the public policy of the State of New York. 1 Consequently, courts will interfere as little as possible with the agreement of consenting parties to submit their disputes to arbitration. 2 Since arbitration is a “cre

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Under Section 10(a) of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), a court will vacate an arbitral award for the following reasons: (1) the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; (2) there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators . . . ; (3) the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy, or of any other misbehavior by which

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Arbitration is an alternative form of dispute resolution where the parties voluntarily agree that a neutral, private person will resolve any legal disputes between them, instead of a judge or jury in a court of law. 1 In business and commercial transactions, arbitration is the preferred means of resolving disputes. It is encouraged and recognized as the public policy of the State of New York. 2 For this reason, “New York courts interfere as little as po

By: Jeffrey M. Haber We have noted previously that the “policy of to encourage arbitration.” 1 For this reason, “ ny doubts as to whether an issue is arbitrable will be resolved in favor of arbitration.” 2 When a party wishes to compel arbitration, that party must establish “the existence of a valid agreement to arbitrate”. 3 This means that, among other things, all parties to the agreement have the power and authority to enter into the agreement. In Wolf v. Hollis Operat

By: Jeffrey M. Haber New York “favors and encourages arbitration as a means of conserving the time and resources of the courts and the contracting parties”. 1 Under the Federal Arbitration Act, “‘questions of arbitrability must be addressed with a healthy regard for the federal policy ... any doubts concerning the scope of arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration.’” 2 Thus, “where the contract contains an arbitration clause, there is a presumption of a

By:  Jeffrey M. Haber Arbitration is an alternative form of dispute resolution where the parties voluntarily agree that a neutral, private person will resolve any legal disputes between them, instead of a judge or jury in a court of law. 1 In business and commercial transactions, arbitration is the preferred means of resolving disputes. It is encouraged and recognized as the public policy of the State of New York. 2 For this reason, “New York courts interfere as little as p

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Litigation can be lengthy, costly and potentially damaging to the financial viability of a business and the financial security of an individual. Often, the parties can resolve their disputes without going to court by using alternative methods such as arbitration and mediation.  Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”) is an area of law devoted to settling disputes without using the court system. ADR is often a shorter and less costly process by which busine

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that enables parties to resolve disputes without going to court. Arbitration is similar to a trial without the formalities. It is an adversarial proceeding where the parties can call witnesses and present evidence to a neutral arbitrator or panel of arbitrators. The rules of discovery and evidence are relaxed to make it a shorter and more cost-efficient process. Often, the parties select the arbit

By: Jeffrey M. Haber When someone speaks of a dispute resolution clause, lawyers most likely think the speaker is referring to an arbitration clause. But, as discussed in Innovative Concepts & Design, LLC v. AL Infinity, LLC , 2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 01122 (1st Dept. Feb. 22, 2022) ( here ), a dispute resolution clause can be something completely different. It can place dispute resolution in the hands of one of the parties to a contract. Such clauses are binding and enforced by th

By:   Jeffrey M. Haber The “policy of to encourage arbitration.” 1 For this reason, “ ny doubts as to whether an issue is arbitrable will be resolved in favor of arbitration.” 2 This is especially so where the agreement to arbitrate incorporates rules that explicitly authorize the arbitrator to resolve all disputes, including those concerning “the formation, existence, validity, interpretation or scope of the agreement under which Arbitration is sought.” 3 In Schindler v.

By   Jeffrey M. Haber Generally, whether a claim is subject to arbitration is a decision for the court, not the arbitrator. 1 Notwithstanding, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that “parties can agree to arbitrate ‘gateway’ questions of ‘arbitrability.’” 2 Such “delegation clauses” are enforceable where “there is ‘clea and unmistakabl ’ evidence” that the parties intended to arbitrate arbitrability issues. 3 “When deciding whether the parties agreed to arbitrate a certain m

Generally, matters that are not covered by an agreement to arbitrate do not have to be arbitrated. After all, arbitration is a creature of contract. And, because an agreement to arbitrate is governed by the rules of contract interpretation, the courts must “give effect to the contractual rights and expectations of the parties.” Volt Info. Scis., Inc. v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior Univ. , 489 U.S. 468, 479 (1989). In other words, “as with any other contract, t

We have noted previously that the “policy of to encourage arbitration.” See Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. Sacharow , 91 N.Y.2d 39 (1997). For this reason, “ ny doubts as to whether an issue is arbitrable will be resolved in favor of arbitration.” State of New York v. Philip Morris Inc. , 30 A.D.3d 26, 31 (1st Dept. 2006), aff’d , 8 N.Y.3d 574 (2007)). This is especially so where the agreement to arbitrate incorporates rules that explicitly authorize the arbitrator to resolve

When parties to a contract delegate the question of arbitrability to an arbitrator, the courts will enforce the agreement as written. They may not, without more, decide the arbitrability issue. This “is true even if the court thinks that the argument that the arbitration agreement applies to a particular dispute is wholly groundless.” Henry Schein, Inc. v Archer & White Sales, Inc. , _____ U.S. at _____, 139 S.Ct. 524, 529 (2019). Thus, “if a valid agreement exists, and if th