top of page
Commercial Litigation
Personal Jurisdiction and the Vacatur of Defaults
By Jonathan H. Freiberger There are two “components and constitutional predicates of personal jurisdiction.” Keane v. Kamin , 94 N.Y.2d 263, 265 (1999). “One component involves service of process, which implicates due process requirements of notice and opportunity to be heard.” Keane , 94 N.Y.2d at 265 (citations omitted). 1 The law is clear that a “court lacks personal jurisdiction over a defendant who is not properly served with process.” Everbank v. Kelly , 203 A.D.3d 13
admin
May 3, 20245 min read
Statute of Limitations for Fraud Claims and Conclusory vs. Particularized Allegations
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In Lane’s Floor Coverings & Interiors, Inc. v. DiLalla , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 02257 (1st Dept. Apr. 25, 2024) ( here ), the Appellate Division, First Department considered an alleged scheme to defraud plaintiff by using checks that were fake or missing endorsements. As discussed below, the Court modified the motion court’s order dismissing the action to deny defendants’ motion as to the fraud claims asserted against Defendant Anthony DiLalla, the branch man
admin
Apr 29, 20246 min read
Foreclosure Complaint Dismissed as Time-Barred Because Service Was “Completed” 5 Days After Six-Month Extension Afforded by the New CPLR 205-a
By Jonathan H. Freiberger In situations where the statute of limitations expires during the pendency of an action, under certain circumstances, CPLR 205 (a) 1 permits the plaintiff to commence a new action if the original action is dismissed but was timely commenced. CPLR 205(a) provides: If an action is timely commenced and is terminated in any other manner than by a voluntary discontinuance, a failure to obtain personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a dismissal of the c
admin
Apr 26, 20246 min read
New York Court of Appeals Holds That The Doctrine of Successor Jurisdiction Applies In a Transaction That Is Less Than a Merger
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The doctrine of successor jurisdiction provides that when two entities merge, the successor entity inherits the merged entity’s jurisdictional status for purposes of specific jurisdiction ( i.e. , personal jurisdiction). Thus, if the merged entity was subject to jurisdiction in a particular forum, then the successor would also be subject to the court’s jurisdiction, regardless of whether the successor entity would otherwise be subject to the court’s juris
admin
Apr 22, 202410 min read


Standing in Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Actions and the Applicability of RPAPL 1302-a to Defaulting Borrower
In order to prosecute a lawsuit, the plaintiff must have standing to do so. Standing involves a determination of whether the party seeking relief has a sufficiently cognizable stake in the outcome so as to cast the dispute in a form traditionally capable of judicial resolution.

Jonathan Freiberger
Apr 19, 20245 min read
Breach of Contract Claim Sustained Where Plaintiff Offered a Facially Reasonable Reading of The Contract
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The foundation of virtually every business and commercial transaction is a contract. It is difficult to imagine a transaction for the purchase or sale of goods, the merger or acquisition of a business, or the provision of services that is not based upon a contract. There is almost nothing more costly to businesses and their owners than a dispute regarding the meaning of a contract. Such disputes often arise over the performance or non-performance of a te
admin
Apr 15, 20247 min read
New York City Sparkies Beware – Be Licensed or be Square
By Jonathan H. Freiberger This BLOG has previously addressed issues related to proper licensure for contractors and the problems that arise for them if they perform work without a license. See, e.g. , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . We have previously noted that home improvement contractors are frequently required by municipalities to be licensed. Unlicensed home improvement contractors are precluded from collecting payments due from ho
admin
Apr 12, 20244 min read
Can an Accountant Hired to Perform “Compilation Services” be Shielded from Liability for the Alleged Improper Activities of a Corporate Officer?
By Jeffery Haber There are four primary levels of services provided by an accountant with respect to an entity’s financial statements: preparation, compilation, review, and audit. A preparation engagement is a basic one. In this level of service, the accountant assists management or the business owner in preparing financial statements for internal use. In a compilation engagement, the accountant assists management or the business owner in the presentation of the entity’s fi
admin
Apr 8, 20246 min read
The Doctrine of Corporation by Estoppel
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Whether a non-existent corporation can enter into a contract is an interesting question. The interesting answer is that sometimes it can. Pursuant to BCL § 403 , a corporation’s existence begins “ pon the filing of the certificate of incorporation by the department of state.” Generally, “a nonexistent entity cannot acquire rights or assume liabilities, a corporation which has not yet been formed normally lacks capacity to enter into a contract.” Ru
admin
Apr 5, 20245 min read
Attorneys May Be Awarded Fees When Contractually Required
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Attorneys are often asked by their clients if they can sue for attorney’s fees. Whether attorney’s fees may be recovered in litigation depends on the circumstances. Under the general rule, attorney’s fees are incidents of litigation, and the prevailing party may not collect them from the loser unless an award is authorized by agreement between the parties, statute or court rule. 1 In LMM Capital Partners, LLC v. Mill Point Capital, LLC , 2024 N.Y. Slip O
admin
Apr 1, 20244 min read


As a Matter of Equity, Hearing Court/Referee was Required to Calculate the Amounts Due in Mortgage Foreclosure Action
This Blog frequently writes on numerous issues related to mortgage foreclosure. One aspect of a foreclosure action is the calculation of the amounts due to the lender.

Jonathan Freiberger
Mar 29, 20243 min read
The Assignment of Litigation Rights and Champerty
By: Jeffrey M. Haber It is not often that we examine a case involving the doctrine of champerty. The last time we did so was on March 8, 2023 ( here ). We also examined the champerty doctrine in 2021 ( here ), 2020 ( here ), and 2016 ( here ). Today, we examine the champerty doctrine in our discussion of IKB Intl. S.A. v. Morgan Stanley , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 01675 (1st Dept. Mar. 26, 2024) ( here ). Champerty is the prohibited practice of purchasing claims for the purpose of
admin
Mar 27, 20247 min read
The Court of Appeals Makes a Ruling on “the Proper Scope of the Trial Court’s Discretion to Grant Leave to Amend a Complaint Under CPLR 3025(b)”
By Jonathan H. Freiberger On March 19, 2024, the Court of Appeals decided Favourite Limited v. Cico , a case concerning “the proper scope of the trial court's discretion to grant leave to amend a complaint under CPLR 3025 (b) .” (Hyperlink added.) [Eds. Note: this BLOG has previously addressed CPLR 3025 < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . This BLOG has previously explained that CPLR 3025(b) provides, in pertinent p
admin
Mar 22, 20245 min read
The Duplication Doctrine and Another Dismissal of a Fraud Claim
By: Jeffrey M. Haber As we have often explained in the articles in which we have examined the duplication doctrine, fraud claims that are nothing more than contract claims dressed up in fraud clothing, are subject to dismissal. E.g. , here , here , here , and here . Thus, courts will apply the doctrine when a plaintiff alleges a breach of contract claim and a fraud claim that arise from the same facts and circumstances. When that happens, the fraud claim will be deemed du
admin
Mar 20, 20244 min read
The Second Department, Pursuant to CPLR 306-b, Extends Time For Plaintiff to Serve Defendant After Lengthy Delay and Expiration of Statute of Limitations
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Actions or proceedings (collectively, “Actions”) are commenced by filing the initiatory papers with the appropriate county clerk. CPLR 304(a) . 1 Once the Action is commenced, the plaintiff is required to serve the initiatory papers on the defendant and, generally, such service must occur within 120 days after the Action is commenced. CPLR 306-b . 2 “If service is not made upon a defendant within the time provided in this section, the court, upon
admin
Mar 18, 20244 min read


Publicly Available Information, Justifiable Reliance and The Caveat Emptor Doctrine
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The common law doctrine of caveat emptor is a well-accepted rule of law in New York. Under the doctrine, the courts will not impose liability on a seller of property for failing to disclose information material to the transaction when the parties deal at arm’s length, [1] unless there is some conduct on the part of the seller which constitutes active concealment. [2] “If, however, some conduct ( i.e. , more than mere silence) on the part of the seller r

Jeffrey Haber
Mar 14, 20245 min read


Collective Alter Ego Liability Theory Rejected By First Department
In commercial and business litigation, it is common for plaintiffs to assert claims against a business entity for wrongs committed by a corporate entity. Often, plaintiffs will try to “pierce the corporate veil,” or get behind the corporate form, to hold the entity’s officers or members liable for the alleged wrongdoing.

Jeffrey Haber
Mar 11, 20247 min read
SECOND DEPARTMENT FINDS LOAN IS NOT SUBJECT TO USURY LAWS BECAUSE PRINCIPAL VALUE EXCEEDS $2,500,000
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Folks have general notions about usury. However, there are many nuances to the application of the usury laws in New York. This BLOG has previously written about usury. See [< here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> .] As noted in our prior BLOG articles, usury statutes were developed centuries ago to “protect desperately poor people from the consequences of their own desperat
admin
Mar 8, 20245 min read
First Department Reminds Practitioners that “proofreading is an essential, indispensable tool in the drafting of contracts”
By: Jeffrey M. Haber It should go without saying that people make mistakes. After all, people are human, and humans make mistakes. When people draft a document, especially a lengthy or complex one, it is not uncommon for a mistake to be made. Lawyers who draft contracts and other written instruments are not immune from this phenomenon. Given the steps a lawyer must take to draft and finalize an agreement or other written instrument there are numerous opportunities for unin
admin
Mar 6, 202412 min read
Second Department Finds Proposed Amendment to Complaint Patently Devoid of Merit Because Pleading a Cause of Action for Breach of Contract “precludes” a Cause of Action for Anticipatory Breach of t...
By Jonathan H. Freiberger People and businesses enter into all kinds of contracts with the expectation that the other party will perform according to the respective promises of the parties. [This BLOG has discussed the basics of contract formation and breach, inter alia , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> .] It is well known that a party to a contra
admin
Mar 1, 20245 min read
bottom of page
