The New York State Court System On April 7, 2020, Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks issued a memorandum to all trial court justices and judges advising them that, starting on Monday, April 13, 2020, the courts will begin to open their doors, albeit remotely, “for non-essential pending cases” – i.e. , “tort (including medical practice and asbestos), commercial, matrimonial, trusts and estates, and other categories of cases.” ( Here .) To this end, judges are being a

It is not often that the Court of Appeals issues an opinion about the same statute within a short period of time. But, in the span of nine days, the Court issued two opinions addressing General Business Law § 349. On March 24, 2020, the Court of Appeals decided Plavin v. Group Health Inc. , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 02025 (Mar. 24, 2020) ( here ), a case in which the Court was asked to decide whether an insurance company’s alleged misstatements and omissions about its insurance pla

Once an action is commenced, litigants have numerous discovery devices at their fingertips to help flesh-out facts to prove, or defend against, asserted claims. Sometimes, however, a potential litigant believes that a viable claim exists but, for one or more reasons, has insufficient information to bring a claim. The answer is provided by CPLR 3102 (c) , which permits disclosure “before an action is commenced, … to aid in bringing an action, to preserve information or to ai

It is said that justice never sleeps. This is true, even as we adjust to life during the coronavirus pandemic. Although state and federal courts around the country have limited the business they handle, they nonetheless remain open. But what does this mean? The Lower Courts The State of New York has answered this question through several recent court orders. These orders make clear that the courts are, as Chief Judge Janet DiFiore stated in a recent online message, “up and r

Historically, an individual was required to appear, in person, before the notary public acknowledging his/her signature. See In re Napolis , 169 A.D. 469, 471 (1 st Dep’t 1915) (“The court again wishes to express its condemnation of the acts of notaries taking acknowledgments or affidavits without the presence of the party whose acknowledgment is taken or the affiant, and that it will treat as serious professional misconduct the act of any notary thus violating his official

On March 24, 2020, the New York Court of Appeals decided Plavin v. Group Health Inc. , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 02025 (Mar. 24, 2020) ( here ), a case in which the Court was asked by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit to decide whether an insurance company’s alleged misstatements and omissions about its insurance plan, made to over 600,000 current and former New York City employees and retirees, sufficed to satisfy the consumer-oriented element of a claim unde

Sometimes this Blog gets to address numerous issues in its examination of a case. In MDK Hijos Trust v. Nordlicht , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 30793(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Mar. 10, 2020) ( here ), we get the opportunity to do so again. MDK Hijos Trust v. Nordlicht Background Plaintiff, MDK Hijos Trust (“Plaintiff” or “MDK”), sought damages for, among other claims, fraudulent inducement and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with investments by the Katz family (Marcos Katz and

As a general matter, business entities ( e.g. , for-profit and not-for-profit corporations, limited liability companies, and limited partnerships) formed outside the State of New York (whether in another state or a foreign country) may not do business within the State unless they receive authority to do so. See generally , Business Corporation Law (“BCL”) §§ 1301-1320 (corporations), Limited Liability Company Law (“LLCL”) §§ 801-809 (limited liability companies), Not-for-Prof

Most (lay) people think that a breach of contract action involves nothing more than a failure to perform some requirement in a contract. One need look no further than Wikipedia for such a definition. ( Here (“Breach occurs when a party to a contract fails to fulfill its obligation(s) as described in the contract.…”).) But as today’s post shows, there can be more to a breach of contract action than a simple failure to perform. Schum v. Spatorico , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 01816 (4t

Limited liability companies afford their owners protection from personal liability and, therefore, are a common business form. “In 1994, New York State enacted the Limited Liability Company Law (L 1994, ch 576, § 1). A limited liability company is an ‘unincorporated organization of one or more persons having limited liability for the contractual obligations and other liabilities of the business’ (Limited Liability Company Law § 102 ). Section 202 of the Limited Liability Com

Many cases involving an alleged fraud typically rise and fall on the reliance element of the cause of action. Sometimes, the issue before the court is the state of mind of the alleged fraudster. While at other times, the issue concerns whether the defendant made a misrepresentation of material fact. In today’s Fraud Notes, we examine Cohen Bros. Realty Corp. v. Mapes , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 01440 (1st Dept. Mar. 3, 2020) ( here ), a case involving the state of mind element of a

In a prior post ( here ), this Blog discussed Barrett v. Grenda , 2017 NY Slip Op. 07031 (4th Dept. Oct. 6, 2017), a case in which the court dismissed a breach of contract claim because the plaintiff failed to identify the provision of an agreement alleged to have been breached. In NFA Group v. Lotus Research, Inc. , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 01356 (2d Dept. Feb. 26, 2020) ( here ), the Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed the dismissal of a breach of contract action for t

In general, statutes of limitation govern the time in which a cause of action must be interposed after accrual. [This BLOG has previously addressed Statute of Limitations issues < HERE =">HERE</a>"> and < HERE =">HERE</a>"> .] Article 2 of the CPLR addresses statute of limitations issues in New York. Section 201 of the CPLR provides that “ n action … must be commenced within the time specified in this article unless a different time is prescribed by law or a shorter time

Forum non conveniens is a common law doctrine in which a court may dismiss an action because adjudication of the matter is more appropriate in another forum. In New York, the doctrine can be found in CPLR § 327(a). Under this section, a court may stay or dismiss an action if it finds “that in the interest of substantial justice the action should be heard in another forum.” CPLR § 327(a). The party seeking dismissal bears the burden of establishing that New York is not the pr

In very general terms, fraudulent conveyance statutes are designed to protect creditors from situations where a debtor transfers its assets or property to a creditor’s detriment. Sometimes such transfers are made with actual intent to defraud. Other times, transfers may be deemed to be constructively fraudulent regardless of the actual intent of the debtor/transferor. In Sarfati v. Palazzolo , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 30432(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Feb. 7, 2020) ( here ), Justic

People text and e-mail all day and every day. When communicating from a personal smart phone, a privately-owned personal computer or over a personal e-mail network, concerns over privacy are minimized. However, folks do a fair share of their personal business while at work -- often utilizing their work e-mail systems, smart phones and personal computers for same. While convenient, such practices could present problems as an employer may be permitted to have access to infor

In New York State, money judgments are valid for 20 years. CPLR § 211(b) . Money judgments recorded in the county in which real property is located remain liens on that real property for only 10 years. CPLR § 5203(a) . The CPLR, however, permits a judgment creditor to obtain a “renewal judgment,” which would operate to extend the lien of a money judgment on real property for an additional 10-year period. CPLR § 5014 . Thus, CPLR § 5014 presently provides, in pertinent p

On February 6, 2020, Justice Jennifer G. Schecter of the Supreme Court, New York County issued a decision in which she ruled, among other things, that Kesha Rose Sebert (better known by her stage name as Kesha) defamed Lukasz Gottwald (“Gottwald”), the music producer known as Dr. Luke, and Kesha’s former producer, when she claimed, in a text message to Lady Gaga, that he had raped Katy Perry. Gottwald v. Sebert , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 30347(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Feb. 6, 2020

Readers of this Blog know that we like to write about fraud cases. After all, a fraud can be perpetrated in so many contexts. Indeed, the circumstances upon which one can deceive another are limited only by the imagination of the wrongdoer. Sometimes, there are too many reported decisions for us to examine in the depth to which our readers have become accustomed. For this reason, we have created the “Fraud Notes” post in which we will examine multiple decisions addressing fra

On numerous occasions, this Blog has addressed issues surrounding certain notice obligations imposed on mortgage lenders foreclosing on residential property. For example, section 1303 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (“RPAPL”) requires that, under certain circumstances relating to residential property, a foreclosing mortgagee must send statutory notice to the mortgagor and tenants advising them, among other things, that they are in danger of losing their hom