By: Jeffrey M. Haber In past articles, we have discussed the necessity of pleading the “who”, “what”, “when” and “how” of an alleged fraud. See , e.g. , here . In many respects, the requirement to plead the “who”, “what”, “where”, and “how” of an alleged fraud, primarily relates to the first element of the claim – falsity. 1 In this regard, a plaintiff alleging fraud must allege the time, place, and content of the defendant’s false representations, as well as the details of

By Jonathan H. Freiberger In this Blog’s article entitled: “ Revive a Time-Barred Claim Using § 17-101 of New York’s General Obligations Law ,” we discussed the general purpose of statutes of limitations, noting that: “The Statute of Limitations was enacted to afford protection to defendants against defending stale claims after a reasonable period of time had elapsed during which a person of ordinary diligence would bring an action. The statutes embody an important policy of

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Earlier this month, we wrote about how courts enforce contracts that are clear and unambiguous. The title of the article, “ Contracts That Say What They Mean, Mean What They Say ”, aptly describes this fundamental principle of contract interpretation. After all, a contract that is clear and unambiguous on its face reflects the intent of the parties. 1 And, the courts will enforce the parties’ intent when it is plainly written in the agreement. Courts wi

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Arbitration is an alternative form of dispute resolution where the parties voluntarily agree that a neutral, private person will resolve any legal disputes between them, instead of a judge or jury in a court of law. 1 It is encouraged and recognized as the public policy of the State of New York. 2 Consequently, courts will interfere as little as possible with the agreement of consenting parties to submit their disputes to arbitration. 3 Generally, a cou

By Jonathan H. Freiberger This Blog frequently writes about decisions related to residential mortgage foreclosure actions. < Here =">Here</a>" and="and" the="the" articles="articles" hyperlinked="hyperlinked" therein.="therein."> One frequent topic that is always ripe for treatment is the repeated failure of lenders to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of RPAPL 1304 due to shortcomings in the evidence presented on their prima facie case. Suffice it to say, on N

By: Jeffrey M. Haber In today’s article, we consider a case in which, as the title indicates, timing is everything. Before we discuss the case, let’s consider the following scenario. The parties to a litigation reach a settlement in principle. They do so while a motion to dismiss the action (or a motion for summary judgment) is pending. Before the parties can execute the definitive agreement that memorializes their settlement, the court decides the motion and dismisses the a

By: Jeffrey M. Haber The doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel embody related but distinct concepts. They both stand for the general proposition that a party to a litigation should have only one bite at the apple and should not be permitted to relitigate the same issue over and over again. Under the doctrine of res judicata, a final judgment on the merits of a claim precludes re-litigation of that claim by a party, and those in privity with that party. 1 This mea

When a borrower borrows money from a lender the repayment obligation is evidenced by a promissory note signed by the borrower and delivered to the lender.

By: Jeffrey M. Haber This Blog has written numerous articles about Ponzi schemes and the enforcement proceedings that resulted from them. See, e.g., here, here, here, here, and here. In a Ponzi scheme, the operator creates an investment program in which “profits” are paid to earlier investors with money taken from later investors. The “profits” are, therefore, fictitious instead of returns on investment. Ultimately, Ponzi schemes collapse under their own weight, taking invest

By: Jeffrey M. Haber In New York, contracts are to be construed in accordance with the parties’ intent. 1 “The best evidence of what parties to a written agreement intend is what they say in their writing.” 2 Thus, a written agreement that is clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms. 3 Extrinsic evidence of the parties’ intent may be considered only if the agreement is ambiguous. 4 A contract is unambiguous if “on its f

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Defaults by a party to a real estate contract, whether a purchaser or a seller, are a fruitful source of litigation. Among other remedies available to an individual or entity aggrieved by a real estate contract default is specific performance, an issue discussed in this Blog’s article entitled: “ Specific Performance (That’s What I Want) – Would be a Terrible Song Title .” Briefly stated, because of the judicially recognized “unique” nature of real

By: Jeffrey M. Haber People use social media, and the Internet in general, for all sorts of reasons. Investors are no different. Investors use social media to research stocks, look up information on a broker-dealer ( see Broker Check < here =">here</a>"> ) or investment adviser ( see Investment Adviser Public Disclosure < here =">here</a>"> ), find guidance on investing strategies, receive up-to-date news, and discuss the markets with others. While social media offers inve

By: Jeffrey M. Haber A forum selection clause is a contractual provision that sets forth the location designated by the parties for dispute resolution. Such clauses can be found in virtually every type of contract imaginable, e.g., employment agreements, commercial contracts, and purchase and sale agreements. Parties require forum selection clauses to reduce litigation expenses, avoid adverse laws, and mitigate the risks associated with unknown foreign judges and/or juries.

By Jonathan H. Freiberger In its February 20, 2021, article entitled: “ The New York Court of Appeals Decides Four Cases, In One Opinion, Addressing and Clarifying Issues Related to the Timeliness of the Commencement of Mortgage Foreclosure Actions ” (the “Prior Article”), this Blog discussed, Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Engel , 37 N.Y.3d 1 (2021), a February 18, 2021, decision by the New York Court of Appeals. In Freedom , the Court of Appeals decided four cases “each turning

By: Jeffrey M. Haber The SEC Giveth In our last article (posted on September 17, 2021 ( here )) discussing the SEC’s whistleblower program, we noted that the Commission has paid more than $1 billion in awards to hundreds of whistleblowers since issuing its first award in 2012. In the month that followed, the amount paid to whistleblowers increased by more than $87 million. The first award of $11.5 million (announced on September 17, 2021, here ) was paid to two whistleblower

By Jeffrey M. Haber In Aybar v. Aybar , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 05393 (Oct. 7, 2021) ( here ), the New York Court of Appeals was asked to determine whether a foreign corporation that registers to do business in New York consents to the general jurisdiction of the State’s courts. As explained below, in a 5-2 decision, the Court held that registration under the Business Corporation Law (“BCL”) to do business in the State does not confer general jurisdiction over the corporation. Pro

Melville, NY ( Law Firm Newswire ) October 15, 2021 - Freiberger Haber LLP is pleased to announce that co-founding partners, Jonathan H. Freiberger and Jeffrey M. Haber, have been named by Super Lawyers magazine to be among the top lawyers in the New York metropolitan area. This is Mr. Freiberger’s second, and Mr. Haber’s tenth, consecutive year of selection. Both Messrs. Freiberger and Haber were recognized for their work in business litigation. Super Lawyers Magazine® is a

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Many contracts contain provisions requiring that in the event of a default, one party must provide to the other notice of the purported default and an opportunity to cure before the valuable rights under the contract can be terminated. In general “ he purpose of a Notice to Cure is to specifically apprise the of claimed defaults in its obligations under the and of the forfeiture and termination of the if the claimed default is not cured within a