In today’s article, we examine the SEC’s enforcement action against Wisdom Capital Management Group Ltd., an entity that claimed to be an Exempt Reporting Adviser (“ERA”) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”). While ERAs are exempt from SEC registration, they remain subject to the SEC’s examination authority and must provide accurate, verifiable disclosures.

On June 5, 2026, the SEC charged an investment adviser and related entities with a multi-year fraud involving a pooled investment fund that raised about $4 million from 28 investors. The SEC alleged the defendant misappropriated and commingled funds, concealed losses exceeding $3.6 million, and diverted assets for personal use.

Affinity fraud is a form of financial fraud that relies on social connections and trust. It most often occurs within identifiable groups, such as religious, cultural, or ethnic communities, or social organizations, where members share common values, experiences, or identities. Rather than approaching targets as strangers, those promoting the scheme position themselves as insiders, using familiarity and perceived credibility to create comfort and reduce skepticism.

Financial abuse of seniors and other vulnerable adults is among the most damaging and the least visible forms of investor harm. It arises when age, illness, cognitive decline, or dependence on trusted professionals erodes an individual’s ability to evaluate advice or resist coercion, even while legal capacity nominally remains intact.

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Financial exploitation of seniors and vulnerable adults is a significant problem.¹ It is considered by many to be an insidious non-violent form of elder abuse in the United States. While a landmark MetLife study initially estimated that older Americans lose roughly $2.6 to $2.9 billion each year to financial exploitation, more recent research suggests that the cost may be materially higher, potentially exceeding $36 billion annually. These numbers, whethe

Ponzi schemes and affinity fraud frequently overlap because both exploit trust and social interactions to operate effectively.

On August 1, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced (here) that it charged a Wisconsin resident and three limited liability companies that he owns and controls – Investors Capital LLC, Global Investors Capital LLC, and High Income Performance Partners LLC (collectively, the “Entity Defendants”) – with perpetrating a real estate-related offering fraud.

The Custody Rule provides that “it is a fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative act, practice or course of business within the meaning of section 206(4) of the [Advisers] Act … for [a registered investment adviser] to have custody of client funds or securities unless” the adviser implements an enumerated set of requirements to prevent loss, misuse, or misappropriation of those funds and securities.

On June 26, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC”) announced (here) that it charged a Manchester, New Hampshire resident, a real estate investment coach and real estate investment coach, with defrauding investors through real estate investment schemes resulting in losses of at least $3 million.

Today, we examine an enforcement action brought by the SEC involving a Ponzi-like scheme that targeted retired senior citizens that the defendant met through his church community

The allure of guaranteed profits from sophisticated crypto asset and foreign exchange trading served as the underlying predicate for the claims asserted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) against Ramil Palafox (“Defendant”), the founder of Praetorian Group International Corporation (“PGI Global”), a now-defunct entity he controlled, in S.E.C. v. Palafox, Case 1:25-cv-00681 (E.D. Va. 2025). The case marks the first crypto enforcement action under the new Chairma

A Ponzi scheme is intended to give investors the false impression that their investment is profitable. In a Ponzi scheme, the fraudster/promoter pays early investors with money that the investor believes is the return on his/her/its investment. In actuality, the money used to pay the investor comes from the investor’s own principal investment dollars or the pooled investment dollars of subsequent investors.

By: Jeffrey Haber In 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act” or the “Act”) to combat illegal and fraudulent conduct on Wall Street and promote compliance with the federal securities. The Dodd-Frank Act contains whistleblower provisions that authorize the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) to pay substantial cash rewards to whistleblowers that voluntarily provide the SEC with informa

Did Tesla violate securities laws by not disclosing a fatal accident? In May, the driver of a Tesla Model S was killed after colliding with a truck while the Autopilot feature, which is designed to assist drivers in steering, braking and avoiding collisions, was engaged. Since October 2014, Tesla Motor Co. has installed autopilot software in all of its cars, even though the feature is still being tested in a public beta. Now, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") is

What are the requirements to obtain a monetary award under the SEC Whistleblower Program? In June, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") announced its second largest whistleblower award of more than $17 million to a former financial services employee (the largest award of $30 million was awarded in 2014). This bounty comes after the SEC issued two awards in May. The securities watchdog continues to see a significant uptick in whistleblower claims. "The information a

By: Jeffrey M. Haber How do anti-money laundering programs detect suspicious activity? The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") announced in May that it fined two Raymond James entities for systemic flaws in their anti-money laundering programs. The units, Raymond James & Associates (RJA) and Raymond James Financial Service ("RJFS") were fined $8 million and $9 million, respectively. FINRA cited these units for not establishing and implementing adequate procedure