Search Results
797 results found for "park doctrine"
- INFORMAL APPEARANCES
Hall, 185 A.D.3d 1006 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). the office of plaintiff’s counsel, paid the principal balance due on the loan and received a receipt marked Martinez, 181 A.D.3d at 470 (citations, internal quotation marks and brackets omitted). Hall at 2 (some internal quotation marks, brackets and ellipses omitted).
- First Department Rejects Errors in Contract Interpretation as a Basis for Vacating An Arbitration Award
Importantly, the doctrine does not apply to the facts. Wein , 6 N.Y.3d at 483. Application of the doctrine is limited. Matter of Arbitration No. It is a doctrine of last resort. Duferco , 333 F.3d at 389. The doctrine is “limited to the rare occurrences of apparent egregious impropriety on the part of the The petitioner bears a heavy burden when invoking the doctrine.
- THE FIRST DEPARTMENT DECIDES AN ISSUE OF FIRST IMPRESSION RELATED TO THE MAILING REQUIREMENT WHEN SERVICE OF PROCESS IN MADE PURSUANT TO CPLR 308(2)
Petroleum Kings, LLC , 199 A.D.3d 666 (2 nd Dep’t 2021) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted The process server’s affidavit indicated that the mailing envelope was not marked “personal and confidential ” and did not have any markings on it indicating that the mailing was from an attorney or otherwise related However, in actuality, the envelope was not marked “personal and confidential,” but did have some markings extent the address was his business address, the envelope’s extensive litigation-related information markings
- Together We Stand: Court Holds Breach of Contract and Fraudulent Inducement Claims Can Stand Together
Income Fund, L.P. v Citibank, N.A. , 84 A.D.3d 588, 589 (1st Dept. 2011) (internal quotation marks omitted Rhone Group L.L.C. , 15 N.Y.3d 147, 155 (2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Finally, the Court held that the duplication of claims doctrine did not bar the fraudulent inducement
- Misrepresentations Concerning Intent Not to Perform Are Not The Same As Misrepresentations Concerning The Ability to Perform For Duplication Purposes
(citations and quotation marks omitted). Dec. 1, 2020) ( here ), a case in which the plaintiff avoided the duplication of claims doctrine by alleging
- “Self-Styled ‘Long-Established and Well-Regarded’ Commodities Futures Commission Merchant” Loses Fraud Claim On Justifiable Reliance Grounds
“The ‘law of the case’ doctrine is a rule of practice which provides that once an issue is judicially After concluding that the motion court correctly dismissed the action under the law of the case doctrine
- Primer on Insurance Broker Liability (How can You Insure Proper Insurance Coverage)
Petrocelli Group, Inc., 19 N.Y.3d 730, 735 (2012) (citation, internal quotation, internal quotation marks Id. at 969 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
- Second Department Holds Foreclosure Sale Still Valid Despite Reversal of Related Judgment of Foreclosure and Sale
[Citation, internal quotation marks and ellipses omitted; hyperlink added.] (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.) (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.)
- Documentary Evidence, Breach of Contract and Common-Law Indemnification
(internal quotation marks omitted). In addition, under the doctrine of definiteness, the court must be able to determine what, in fact, the part the motion seeking dismissal of the cross-claims. has itself actually participated to some degree in the wrongdoing cannot receive the benefit of the doctrine In Pizzarotti , the Court found that the doctrine did not apply because Phipps was alleged to be the
- Oral Agreements and Contract Formation
certain in its material terms, there can be no legally enforceable contract.” 11 In addition, under the doctrine
- “867-5309” (The “Jenny” Principle and The Importance of Phone Numbers)
Schiffman , 36 N.Y.3d 550, 555 (2021) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). an affirmative defense , the foreclosing lender must demonstrate its compliance with the statute as part Matles , 185 A.D.3d 703, 706 (2 nd Dep’t 2020) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Davidson , 202 A.D.3d at 882 (citations, internal quotation marks and brackets omitted); see also U.S (Citation, internal quotation marks and ellipses omitted.)
- First Department Holds Mortgagor That Sold Property During Foreclosure Has Standing to Raise RPAPL 1304 Defense Because He May Be Liable For Deficiency
Schiffman, 36 N.Y.3d 550, 555 (2021) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). an affirmative defense, the foreclosing lender must demonstrate its compliance with the statute as part Davidson, 202 A.D.3d at 882 (citations, internal quotation marks and brackets omitted); see also U.S. County of Albany, 3 N.Y.3d 475, 479 (2004) (citations, internal quotation marks and brackets omitted) For the most part, the facts in Nationstar are routine.

