Search Results

event of any inconsistency, there was no such inconsistency, since it was silent as to plaintiff’s right

pledge that neither party shall do anything which will have the effect of destroying or injuring the right

Carter accepted the offer but did so “without waiver to any of her rights at law, including her right In so holding, the Court rejected Royal’s argument that Carter gave up the right to seek attorney’s fees not what its heading implied and its first sentence said that it was, Carter’s letter, reserving a right

often brought by shareholders of a corporation (or limited liability company) to vindicate the entity’s rights . 1 Although shareholders are given the right to bring such lawsuits, they are not, however, favored

Purchaser, nevertheless, may elect to accept such title as Seller may be able to convey with a credit estimated cost to cure the same (up to the Maximum Expense described below), but without any other credit The Court found that “ ecause the defendant acted within its rights pursuant to section 13.02 of the The Court recognized that “ s a threshold matter, in light of the defendant’s obligation to deliver the and receive a return of its down payment, or accept the property with the remaining tenancies and a credit

Thereafter, plaintiffs commenced the action to enforce their purported contractual rights to purchase

Defendant also allegedly learned that the Liberation companies were in default of their Credit Agreement estates of the Liberation companies, stood in the shoes of the Liberation companies and had no greater rights

No problem – right? commencement of the six-month period for the purposes of CPLR 205(a) begins, “when all appeals as of right the first action was dismissed based on plaintiff’s default and, therefore, was not appealable as of right [Editor’s Note – this BLOG has analyzed CPLR 3215(c) < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> .] [Editor’s Note – this BLOG has analyzed the mortgage discharge provisions of RPAPL Article 15 < HERE

For this reason, “a party will not be compelled to arbitrate and, thereby, to surrender the right to inter alia , a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against all defendants in connection with his rights In response, ACenni argued that he was primarily seeking equitable relief to establish his rights, duties Baldwin Tech. , as noted, the court held that an arbitration agreement that provides the parties with the right Such a provision “is merely declaratory of existing legal rights.” Erving v.

intervention.” 4 Notably, an alleged injury will not confer standing if it is based on speculation about what might occur in the future or what future harm might be incurred. 5 Background Plaintiff, a former patient allege that a third party accessed data more readily used for financial crimes such as dates of birth, credit Wright , 45 A.D.3d 1369, 1370 (4th Dept. 2007). Citing Galaria v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.

scheduling of  conferences “for the purpose of holding settlement discussions pertaining to the relative rights

Accordingly, a tenant must be mindful of its rights in the face of a default/cure notice from a landlord The court credited tenant's explanation that it did not immediately repair the raised slab, believing