smart phone or computer, and such access may operate to waive certain privileges otherwise afforded by law In describing the attorney-client privilege (under Federal law), the Asia Court stated that “a client facilitating the rendition of professional legal services to the client, between the client and the client's lawyer (or certain representatives of the client and the lawyer).”  of a “disputed or incomplete factual record’’ the Court was prevented from deciding “as a matter of law

charged defendants with violating the registration and anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws

This Court reasoned that “the Countrywide defendants not establish[ ], as a matter of law, that the Countrywide argued that under established law contractual jury waivers are broad enough to cover fraud Under New York law, a jury waiver clause does not apply where the party alleging fraudulent inducement Takeaway Under New York law, where a plaintiff challenges the validity of an agreement because of fraud

negotiation of the Exhibit E renewal, fraudulent inducement, violation of New York General Business Law

Dismissal Due to Documentary Evidence Under Section 3211(a) of the Civil Practice Law and Rules (“CPLR Laws of N.Y., Book 7B, C.P.L.R. C3211:10 at 22. See also VXI Lux Holdco S.A.R.L. v. .2d 314, 326 (2002)), and “conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law and emails utterly refuted plaintiffs’ claim and conclusively established a defense as a matter of law Whether a contract is ambiguous presents a question of law for resolution by the courts.

General Obligations Law § 5-703), as there was no written agreement between the parties.

Stonepath Grp., Inc. , 343 F.3d 189, 196-97 (2d Cir. 2003) (loss causation in common law fraud claims Faessel , 297 A.D.2d 28, 31 (1st Dept. 2002) (“ oss causation is the fundamental core of the common-law contract, and (9) violations of New York’s Deceptive Trade Practices Act, New York General Business Law Minzer is a good reminder that a plaintiff can get to the finish line but not cross it because of a

which is reprinted below), addressed issues related to the need for attorneys admitted to practice law in New York, but who failed to maintain an office as required by section 470 of New York’s Judiciary Law , must be dismissed as a nullity, should not be the law in New York State.   in New York for violations of Judiciary Law section 470. however does not address the issue of virtual a virtual office is insufficient to satisfy the requirements of section 470 of New York’s Judiciary Law

Melville, NY ( Law Firm Newswire ) January 30, 2019 -  Jonathan H. Freiberger, a member of the law firm of Freiberger Haber LLP, was recently quoted in the New York Post The firm combines the sophistication and counsel of a large national law firm with the economy, flexibility The law firm responsible for this advertisement is Freiberger Haber LLP, 425 Broadhollow Road, Suite

Lawyers are governed by law and rules, which if not followed can result in sanctions from the court. A Primer on the Law and Rules Governing Pretrial Depositions In New York, the conduct of counsel in a necessary, and (iii) no more than extensive than required to protect the witness against the improper line

An insider is responsible for ensuring that his or her family complies with insider trading laws.

Here, the failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, as it failed