By: Jeffrey M. Haber Most litigants think that financial documents, such as tax returns, are confidential. The same is true with regard to trade secrets and other proprietary business information. While those sentiments are most often true, as discussed below, litigants are, nevertheless, often surprised to learn that there are well-developed rules governing the protection of such information from public view. “Under New York law, there is a broad presumption that the public

By: Jeffrey M. Haber In 1990, Congress created the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visa Program (“EB-5 Program”) to stimulate the U.S. economy through job creation and capital investment by foreign investors. The EB-5 Program offers foreign investors and members of their family an opportunity to obtain permanent residence in the United States ( i.e. , obtain a green card) and provides a source of financing for developers to use in, among other things, construction and business projec

On July 12, 2023, the Appellate Division, Second Department, in U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Rahman, addressed an issue that has been confusing lawyers for quite some time involving 22 N.Y.C.R.R. §202.48

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Under New York law, there are two methods by which a person can domesticate a foreign judgment – i.e. , a judgment obtained outside the State of New York. The first method is contained in Article 54 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules (“CPLR”), which codified the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act. Under CPLR § 5402(a), to recognize a foreign judgment, a judgment creditor must: (1) file the foreign judgment within 90 days of the date of the judg

The common law doctrine of caveat emptor is a well-accepted rule of law in New York. Under the doctrine, the courts will not impose liability on a seller of property for failing to disclose information material to the transaction when the parties deal at arm’s length, unless there is some conduct on the part of the seller which constitutes active concealment.

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Folks sign contracts of all types that purport to contain limitations of liability; but are they enforceable. In many cases, the answer is “yes”. “In the absence of a contravening public policy, exculpatory provisions in a contract, purporting to insulate one of the parties from liability resulting from the party’s own negligence, although disfavored by the law and closely scrutinized by the courts, generally are enforced, subject however to variou

By: Jeffrey M. Haber The voluntary payment doctrine bars recovery of payments voluntarily made with full knowledge of the facts, and in the absence of fraud or material mistake of fact or law. 1 Notably, there is a presumption that payments are voluntary. 2 Thus, to rebut the presumption, the plaintiff must show that he/she protested the payment. In order for a protest to be effective, it must be in writing and made at the time of payment. 3 In addition, the written protest

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Because there have been a number of appellate decisions interpreting RPAPL 1304 , this Blog has written frequently on that topic. See, e.g. , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . By way

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Today’s Blog involves motions to renew and reargue and successive motions for summary judgment. When a motion is denied, a movant has several options. One can accept the loss and move on. An appeal can also be pursued. Additional options are also available under CPLR 2221 , which permits a movant to move for renewal or reargument. A motion to renew is “properly made to the motion court (CPLR 2221) to draw its attention to material facts which, al

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Generally speaking, “term sheets” outline the basic terms of a transaction being negotiated by the parties thereto. This Blog has previously addressed the enforceability of “term sheets.” See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . On June 15, 2023, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided Parkmerced Investors, LLC v. WeWork Companie

By: Jeffrey M. Haber A common theme in commercial litigation is the assertion of a breach of contract claim and a fraudulent inducement claim. Where both claims are asserted, more times than not, the fraud claim is dismissed under the duplication of claims doctrine – a principle of law that stands for the proposition that a fraud claim cannot stand side-by-side with a breach of contract claim when there is “a valid and enforceable written contract govern a particular subje

By Jonathan H. Freiberger This Blog has frequently written about RPALP 1304 . By way of background, and as previously noted in this Blog, RPAPL 1304 requires that at least ninety days before commencing legal action against a borrower with respect to a “home loan” (as defined in the relevant statutes), a “lender, assignee or mortgage loan servicer” must: send written notice to the borrower by certified and regular mail that the loan is in default; provide a list of approved h

By: Jeffrey Haber Section 3211(a)(8) of the Civil Practice Law and Rule (“CPLR”) allows a party to “move for judgment dismissing one or more causes of action asserted against him on the ground that … the court has not jurisdiction of the person of the defendant.” Whether the court has personal jurisdiction over a non-domiciliary involves a two-part inquiry: (1) the exercise of jurisdiction must be permissible under New York’s long-arm statute; and (2) the exercise of jurisd

Query: does the recipient of an assignment via a contract or a note automatically have the right to assert tort claims, including fraud claims, arising from that contract or note? In SureFire Dividend Capture, LP v. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Financial Services LLC , 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 02841 (1st Dept. May 25, 2023) ( here ), the Appellate Division, First Department answered the question in the negative. The reason, as one would expect, depends on the language used

By: Jeffrey Haber Commercial contracts typically include a liquidated damages provision that allows for the payment of a predetermined amount of damages in the event of a breach by one of the parties. Courts will sustain such a provision if the liquidated amount is reasonably proportionate to the probable loss and the amount of actual loss is incapable or difficult of precise estimation. If, however, the amount fixed is grossly disproportionate to the probable loss, then the

By Jonathan H. Freiberger The question of when parties must close title on a real estate transaction is often answered by another question – has either party sent a “time of the essence” letter? [Eds. Note: this Blog has previously addressed “time of the essence” letters < here =">here</a>"> .] The law is settled that when “a contract for the sale of real property does not make time of the essence, the law permits a reasonable time in which to tender performance, regardless

By: Jeffrey M. Haber This Blog has previously written about the benefits of forming a corporation or a limited liability corporation and the perils of ignoring the corporate formalities that are attendant thereto ( see , e.g. , here , here , here , here , and here ). In today’s article, we examine the alleged use of the corporate entity to commit a wrong on another and the court’s unwillingness to pierce the corporate veil to hold the owner personally liable for that wrongful

By: Jeffrey M. Haber To plead a fraud cause of action, a plaintiff must allege: (1) a misrepresentation of material fact; (2) falsity; (3) scienter; (4) justifiable reliance; and (5) damages. 1 Each element of the claim must be satisfied for the plaintiff to prevail on the cause of action. The failure to satisfy each element will result in dismissal of the claim. In Hayes v. Martinez , 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 02587 (1st Dept. May 11, 2023) ( here ), the Appellate Division, First

By Jonathan H. Freiberger This Blog has previously discussed issues related to whether a binding agreement (a settlement agreement or otherwise) was formed by parties to a dispute. See, e.g. , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . In our prior articles we discussed, inter alia , the elements of contract formation and whether emails suffice to satisfy signing requirements. Such issues were releva

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Pursuant to CPLR 3014 , inter alia , “ copy of any writing which is attached to a pleading is part thereof for all purposes.” Where “a copy of the agreement is annexed to and made a part of the complaint, the rights and duties of the parties must be determined by the terms of the contract annexed to the complaint, and not by the plaintiff’s characterization or construction thereof in his pleading he rights of the parties thereunder must be determin