In New York, foreign entities – that is, corporations, limited liability companies and partnerships authorized to do business in another jurisdiction or country – are required to register to business with the Secretary of State. See BCL § 1312(a). The failure to receive such authority deprives the foreign entity of the ability to affirmatively access the courts of New York and subjects any action commenced by the foreign entity to dismissal. See United Envtl. Techniques, Inc

The New York Court of Appeals has described as “familiar and eminently sensible,” the proposition of law “that, when parties set down their agreements in a clear, complete document, their writing should be enforced according to its terms.” 159 MP Corp. v. Redbridge Bedford, LLC , 33 N.Y.3d 353, 358 (2019) (citation, internal quotation marks and ellipses omitted). The same Court has also explained the particular importance of such a rule in the context of real property trans

Sometimes the Court renders a decision on a motion instead of issuing an order or judgment. In such cases it is often up to the prevailing litigant to take an additional step to effectuate the decision. In cases where Rule 202.48 of the Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court and the County Court is applicable the prevailing party must move quickly or run the risk of losing the benefit of a coveted victory.

“A cause of action for fraud does not arise when the only fraud charged relates to a breach of contract.” Krantz v. Chateau Stores of Can. Ltd. , 256 A.D.2d 186, 187 (1st Dept. 1998) (citations omitted). “To plead a viable cause of action for fraud arising out of a contractual relationship, the plaintiff must allege a breach of duty which is collateral or extraneous to the contract between the parties.” Id. (citations and quotation marks omitted). One way to satisfy this re

In Trustees of Columbia Univ. in the City of N.Y. v. D’Agostino Supermarkets, Inc. , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 06937 (Nov. 24, 2020) ( here ), the New York Court of Appeals was asked to “consider the propriety of a liquidated damages provision in a Surrender Agreement between two New York City icons: Columbia University, one of the City’s premier universities, and D’Agostino Supermarkets, a family-owned food market chain founded in 1932.” Slip Op. at *1. D’Agostino had leased proper

Hang on Sloopy was a hit song in the mid-1960s. Years later, the band that performed and recorded the song – the McCoys – claimed that they were cheated out of substantial sums of money due to fraud. That claim, however, was time-barred, held the Court in Derringer v F.G.G. Prods. Inc. , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 33854(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Nov. 18, 2020) ( here ). Fraud claims must be commenced within “the greater of six years from the date the cause of action accrued or two ye

Sometimes, a case involves facts and circumstances that, on their face, lead a court to determine that a fraud was committed. Such was the case in First Franklin Fin. Corp. v. Merchant , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 06852 (1st Dept. Nov. 19, 2020) ( here ). In First Franklin , a judgment debtor transferred property subject to a foreclosure sale to a company that he had formed all on the same day. Such facts and circumstances, said the lower court, represented “badges of fraud” under f

On November 4, 2020, this Blog (the “November 4 Blog”) provided an update on the New York State Court system’s preparation for the anticipated surge in COVID-19 cases. On November 18, 2020, Andrew A. Crecca, the District Administrative Judge for the 10 th Judicial District (Suffolk County), circulated a memorandum on “Suffolk County Updated Operating Protocols <“the plan”> Effective November 23, 2020” (the “Memorandum”). As noted in the November 4 Blog, “the country has

On April 4, 2020, the New York Uniform Voidable Transactions Act (“NYUVTA”) became effective, replacing Article 10, Sections 270-281 of the Debtor and Creditor Law (“DCL”), the State’s almost century-old fraudulent conveyance law. In February of this year, this Blog examined the NYUVTA, the DCL and the changes the NYUVTA made to the DCL ( here ). Since the NYUVTA applies to cases filed on or after April 4, 2020, there remain many cases under the former DCL that are being li

This BLOG has previously addressed issues related to Statutes of Limitations. See, among many others, < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , and < HERE =">HERE</a>"> . Earlier this year, this BLOG posted “ Revive A Time-Barred Claim Using § 17-101 of New York’s General Obligations Law ”, in which, in addition tothe renewal of expired Statutes of Limitation under GOL § 17–101, the purpose and history of Statutes of Limitation was addressed. St

A “recurring question” courts in New York grapple with is whether the facts alleged in a complaint give rise to sustainable claims for both breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. Cronos Grp. v. XComIP, LLC , 156 A.D.3d 54, 56 (1st Dept. 2017). Readers of this Blog know that a fraud claim, which “ar from the same facts , s identical damages and d not allege a breach of any duty collateral to or independent of the parties’ agreements<,> is subject to dismissal as red

Disputes between an insured and insurer occur all the time. These disputes often concern whether the policy covers a certain event. Sometimes, as in AB Oil Servs., Ltd. v. TCE Ins. Servs., Inc. , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 06232 (2d Dept. Nov. 4, 2020) ( here ), the dispute concerns the alleged failure to satisfy a specific request for coverage not already provided in one’s policy. Other times, the dispute concerns alleged fraud and negligent misrepresentation ( i.e. , breach of a du

CPLR 3215(c) , which encourages the prompt entry of default judgments, provides: If the plaintiff fails to take proceedings for the entry of judgment within one year after the default, the court shall not enter judgment but shall dismiss the complaint as abandoned, without costs, upon its own initiative or on motion, unless sufficient cause is shown why the complaint should not be dismissed.  A motion by the defendant under this subdivision does not constitute an appearance i

As readers of the Blog know, when it comes to fraud-based actions, we like to write about them. While many of the cases we examine fall into similar patterns, sometimes a case deviates from the norm. King Penguin Opportunity Fund III, LLC v. Spectrum Group Mgt. LLC , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 06230 (1st Dept. Oct. 29, 2020) ( here ), is such as case. King Penguin concerned, among other claims, a fraudulent inducement claim arising from the execution of a term sheet for a proposed l

Readers of this Blog know that, as a general matter, New York courts will not permit a fraud-based claim ( i.e. , fraudulent inducement) to survive a motion to dismiss when the claim arises from a breach of contract. Indeed, courts routinely dismiss a fraud claim where “ he existence of a valid and enforceable written contract govern a particular subject matter” and the recovery sought arises out of the same facts and circumstances. Clark-Fitzpatrick v. Long Is. , 70 N.Y.2d

A shareholder’s derivative action is a lawsuit “brought in the right of a … corporation to procure a judgment in its favor, by a holder of shares or of voting trust certificates of the corporation or of a beneficial interest in such shares or certificates.” Marx v. Akers , 88 N.Y.2d 189, 193 (1996) (quoting Business Corporation Law § 626 (a)). Derivative claims against corporate officers and directors belong to the corporation itself. Auerbach v. Bennett , 47 N.Y.2d 619, 631

Every now and then, we come across a legal principle that we do not frequently write about. One such principle is replevin. A plaintiff brings an action in replevin to recover personal property that was wrongfully taken or withheld. Pivar v. Graduate School of Figurative Art , 290 A.D.2d 212, 212 (1st Dept. 2002) (citations omitted). In a replevin action, the plaintiff seeks the return of property, not money damages. Genger v. Genger , 2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 30602 (Sup. Ct., N.Y.

In keeping with this BLOG’s efforts to keep abreast of court practices and procedures promulgated to address COVID-19 concerns, practitioners should be aware of new foreclosure sale scheduling rules. By way of background, on July 24, 2020, Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks issued Administrative Order 157/20 (“AO 157/20”) < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , which became effective on July 27, 2020 and established certain “procedures and protocols apply to the conduct of resident

In order for the conduct of business to proceed in an orderly fashion, folks need to be confident that, in general, the contracts that they enter into, particularly when “the parties set down their agreements in a clear, complete document” will “be enforced according to terms”. 159 MP Corp. v. Redbridge Bedford, LLC , 33 N.Y.3d 353, 358 (2019) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). This is consistent with the notion that “ n New York, agreements negotiated at ar

Attorneys are often asked whether an agreement that is not formally reduced to writing or not in writing at all is enforceable. Most will say that the answer depends on the surrounding facts and circumstances. Since the question often arises in the context of a contract dispute, it is helpful to examine the legal principles that guide the determination of contract enforceability. The elements of a cause of action for breach of contract are (1) the formation of an agreement,