Real Estate Litigation

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger Many times, remedies for the breach of a contract other than monetary damages are necessary to make a plaintiff whole. One such remedy is specific performance. The remedy of specific performance “will not be ordered where money damages would be adequate to protect the expectation interests of the injured party.” Sokoloff v. Harriman Estates Development Corp. , 96 N.Y.2d 409, 415 (2001) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Specific perf

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger Today’s BLOG article concerns CPLR 306-b . As previously explained in prior articles, actions or proceedings (collectively, “Actions”) are commenced by filing the initiatory papers with the appropriate county clerk. CPLR 304(a) . Once the Action is commenced, the plaintiff is required to serve the initiatory papers on the defendant, and generally such service must occur within 120 days after the Action is commenced. CPLR 306-b. “If service is not

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger As readers of this BLOG know, we frequently write about issues relating to mortgage foreclosure. We have also written numerous articles relating to the recently enacted FAPA. See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . Today’s BLOG article relates to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Edwards , a case decided by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on October 30, 202

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger Today’s BLOG article relates to Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Miglucci , a mortgage foreclosure action decided by the Appellate Division, Third Department, on October 17, 2024. The Court in Miglucci determined that the accrual date of a cause of action for the foreclosure of a reverse mortgage generally accrues upon the death of the borrower. In 2008, the Miglucci borrower borrowed money from the lender and secured her repayment obligations

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger A notice of pendency (or lis pendens ) is a provisional remedy available to litigants seeking a judgment that affects title to real property. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O&Y Equity Corp. , 64 N.Y.2d 313 (1984). The purpose of a notice of pendency is to put defendants and the world on notice of the full scope of the rights claimed by plaintiffs to defendants’ real property. Sjogren v. Land Assoc., LLC , 223 A.D.3d 963, 965 (3 rd Dep’t 2024). Notices of pen

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger Because litigation can be a long and drawn-out process, it is not uncommon for litigants to die during the pendency of a lawsuit. In today’s BLOG article, we address the problems that may arise when a litigant dies. This BLOG has previously addressed this issue. See, e.g ., < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . As previously noted in prior BLOG articles, in this context CPLR § 1015 – Substitution Upon Death – is instructive and provides:

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger Today’s BLOG article relates to fraudulent concealment, caveat emptor and justifiable reliance when purchasing real property. As readers of this BLOG know, a “cause of action to recover damages for fraudulent misrepresentation requires a misrepresentation or a material omission of fact which was false and known to be false by defendant, made for the purpose of inducing the other party to rely upon it, justifiable reliance of the other party on the

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger Sometimes this BLOG takes an in-depth look at recently decided cases from New York’s appellate courts; other times it simply reports on cases with an interesting holding. Today’s BLOG reflects the latter. Bank of New York Mellon v. Levinson , is a mortgage foreclosure action decided by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on August 14, 2024. The defendant/borrower in Bank of New York , borrowed $1.2 million from the lender and secured his repa

By Jonathan H. Freiberger In situations where the statute of limitations expires during the pendency of an action, under certain circumstances, CPLR 205 (a) 1 permits the plaintiff to commence a new action if the original action is dismissed but was timely commenced. CPLR 205(a) provides: If an action is timely commenced and is terminated in any other manner than by a voluntary discontinuance, a failure to obtain personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a dismissal of the c

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Whether a non-existent corporation can enter into a contract is an interesting question. The interesting answer is that sometimes it can.  Pursuant to BCL § 403 , a corporation’s existence begins “ pon the filing of the certificate of incorporation by the department of state.”  Generally, “a nonexistent entity cannot acquire rights or assume liabilities, a corporation which has not yet been formed normally lacks capacity to enter into a contract.” Ru

By Jonathan H. Freiberger This BLOG has written numerous times on issues related to statutes of limitation in mortgage foreclosure actions.  See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . As previously described in this BLOG an action to foreclose a mortgage is governed by a six-year statute of limitatio

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Today we revisit CPLR 3215(c), a provision addressed several times by this Blog.  See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . By way of brief background, and as set forth in one of our prior Blogs, Rule 3215(c) of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules provides, in pertinent part, that: If the plaintiff fails to take proceedings for the ent

By Jonathan H. Freiberger This BLOG has written numerous times on statutes of limitation issues in mortgage foreclosure actions.  See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . Briefly stated, and as has been stated previously in this BLOG, an action to foreclose a mortgage is governed by a six-year statute of limitations.  CP

By Jonathan H. Freiberger For a variety of reasons, a party asserting a claim may choose to discontinue same.  In such circumstances, CPLR 3217 , provides the mechanism to do so.  [Eds. Note: this BLOG has addressed CPLR 3217 < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> .]   CPLR 3217(a), which addresses situations where a party asserting a claim may voluntarily discontinue a claim without the need for a court order, permits the party to do so, inter alia : (1) by serving o

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Today’s BLOG article addresses the circumstances pursuant to which the buyer under a real estate sales contract is entitled to prejudgment statutory interest pursuant to CPLR 5001(a) on the return of its down payment upon seller’s breach of that contract. CPLR 5001(a) provides that “ nterest shall be recovered upon a sum awarded because of a breach of performance of a contract, or because of an act or omission depriving or otherwise interfering with

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Today’s Blog relates to extensions of time to serve a defendant under CPLR 306-b, a topic previously addressed by this Blog < HERE =">HERE</a>"> , < HERE =">HERE</a>"> and < HERE =">HERE</a>"> .  The background discussion in today’s Blog was taken from the linked prior Blogs. Under the present “commencement by filing” system, an action (or proceeding) (collectively, an “Action”) is commenced by filing (CPLR 304(a)) the initiatory paper(s) with the “

By Jonathan H. Freiberger This BLOG has written numerous times on issues related to contract formation.  See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> .  Briefly stated, “ o create a binding contract, there must be a manifestation of mutual assent sufficiently definite to assure that the parties are truly in agreement with all material terms.”  Total Telcom Group Corp. v. Kendal on Hudson , 157

By Jonathan H. Freiberger This BLOG has written numerous times on statutes of limitation issues in mortgage foreclosure actions.  See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . Briefly stated, and as has been stated previously in this BLOG, an action to foreclose a mortgage is governed by a six-year statute of limitations.  CPLR 213(4) .  See also ,

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Among the problems resulting from COVID-19, is the pandemic’s effect on business.  Numerous businesses were forced to close due to lock downs and supply chain issues.  The economic slowdowns and business closures caused by the pandemic has generated much litigation; a great deal of which has occurred in the landlord/tenant arena.  [This BLOG has addressed landlord/tenant COVID-19 related litigation < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Many times, remedies for the breach of a contract other than monetary damages are necessary to make a plaintiff whole.  One such remedy is specific performance [a topic previously addressed by this BLOG, inter alia ,  < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> ].  The remedy of specific performance “will not be ordered where money damages would be adequate to protect the expectat