top of page
All Posts
Vacatur Under the FAA – It Isn’t Easy
By: Jeffrey M. Haber This Blog has posted numerous articles concerning vacatur of an arbitration award under Article 75 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules (“CPLR”). E.g. , here , here , and here . On occasion, we have posted articles concerning vacatur under the Federal Arbitration Action (“FAA”). Today, we revisit vacatur under the FAA through our examination of Matter of Patel v. Macy’s Inc. , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 02782 (1st Dept. May 21, 2024) ( here ). Patel involved a pe
admin
May 22, 20247 min read
The New York Court of Appeals Reminds Litigants That Words in Contracts Have Meaning
By: Jeffrey M. Haber When parties enter into a contract, each assumes that the language in their agreement accurately memorializes their understandings and intentions. For this reason, when a dispute arises, the courts in New York look to the intent of the parties as expressed by the language they chose to put into their writing. 1 A clear, complete document will be enforced according to its terms. 2 When the parties have a dispute over the meaning of their contract, the cou
admin
May 20, 20246 min read
First Department Definitively Holds that an Account Stated Cause of Action is Independent, and Not Duplicative, of a Breach of Contract Cause of Action
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Today’s BLOG article touches on two areas of the law on which we have previously written – account stated 1 and duplication. 2 “An account stated is an agreement between parties to an account based on prior transactions between them with respect to the correctness of the account items and balance due.” Accent Collections, Inc. v. Cappelli Enterprises, Inc. , 94 A.D.3d 1026 (2 nd Dep’t 2012) (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.) See als
admin
May 17, 20245 min read
The Former DCL Remains On The Docket
By: Jeffrey M. Haber As readers of this Blog know, on December 6, 2019, the State of New York joined the vast majority of jurisdictions to adopt the Uniform Voidable Transaction Act (“UVTA”) in whole or in part. The New York version of the UVTA became effective on April 4, 2020. The UVTA governs fraudulent transfers. Although it has been four years since the effective date of the UVTA, there remain scores of cases in the court system that were filed under the former Debtor Cr
admin
May 15, 20247 min read
First Department Reinforces Rule That Written Agreements Are To Be Construed In Accordance With The Parties’ Intent, The Best Evidence Of Which Is What They Say In Their Writing
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In Cline v. Grodin , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 02586 (1st Dept. May 9, 2024) ( here ), the Appellate Division, First Department was asked to consider whether an agreement involving a limited partnership permitted the general partner to employ and compensate others, including the limited partners, to run the day-to-day business operations of the limited partnership. As discussed below, the Court answered the question in the affirmative. Cline involved Alcova Cap
admin
May 13, 20244 min read
Enforcement News: More Than 1,500 SEC Filings Affected By Alleged Fraud Perpetrated By Accounting Firm and Its Owner
By: Jeffrey M. Haber On May 3, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) announced ( here ) that it charged audit firm BF Borgers CPA PC and its owner, Benjamin F. Borgers (together, “Respondents”), 1 with deliberate and systemic failures to comply with Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards in its audits and reviews incorporated in more than 1,500 SEC filings from January 2021 through June 2023. The SEC also charged Responde
admin
May 8, 20243 min read
Failure to Identify a Statement Claimed to Be False and Text Messages as Documentary Evidence
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In Nosegbe v. Charles , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 02406 (4th Dept. May 3, 2024) ( here ), the Appellate Division, Fourth Department affirmed the dismissal of a fraud claim because the plaintiff failed to identify the statement claimed to be false. The Court also reinstated a claim that the motion court dismissed on the grounds that, inter alia , the text message on which the lower court relied was not documentary evidence within the meaning of CPLR 3211(a)(1). W
admin
May 6, 20243 min read
Personal Jurisdiction and the Vacatur of Defaults
By Jonathan H. Freiberger There are two “components and constitutional predicates of personal jurisdiction.” Keane v. Kamin , 94 N.Y.2d 263, 265 (1999). “One component involves service of process, which implicates due process requirements of notice and opportunity to be heard.” Keane , 94 N.Y.2d at 265 (citations omitted). 1 The law is clear that a “court lacks personal jurisdiction over a defendant who is not properly served with process.” Everbank v. Kelly , 203 A.D.3d 13
admin
May 3, 20245 min read
Enforcement News: SEC Enforces Violations of Amended Marketing Rule Against Five Investment Advisors
By: Jeffrey M. Haber On December 22, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) adopted significant amendments to Rule 206(4)-1 promulgated under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Amended Marketing Rule”). Rule 206(4)-1 governs marketing by Commission-registered investment advisers.1 Among other things, the Amended Marketing Rule states that it is unlawful for registered investment advisers, directly or indirectly, to disseminate any
admin
May 1, 20244 min read
Statute of Limitations for Fraud Claims and Conclusory vs. Particularized Allegations
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In Lane’s Floor Coverings & Interiors, Inc. v. DiLalla , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 02257 (1st Dept. Apr. 25, 2024) ( here ), the Appellate Division, First Department considered an alleged scheme to defraud plaintiff by using checks that were fake or missing endorsements. As discussed below, the Court modified the motion court’s order dismissing the action to deny defendants’ motion as to the fraud claims asserted against Defendant Anthony DiLalla, the branch man
admin
Apr 29, 20246 min read
Foreclosure Complaint Dismissed as Time-Barred Because Service Was “Completed” 5 Days After Six-Month Extension Afforded by the New CPLR 205-a
By Jonathan H. Freiberger In situations where the statute of limitations expires during the pendency of an action, under certain circumstances, CPLR 205 (a) 1 permits the plaintiff to commence a new action if the original action is dismissed but was timely commenced. CPLR 205(a) provides: If an action is timely commenced and is terminated in any other manner than by a voluntary discontinuance, a failure to obtain personal jurisdiction over the defendant, a dismissal of the c
admin
Apr 26, 20246 min read
New York Court of Appeals Holds That The Doctrine of Successor Jurisdiction Applies In a Transaction That Is Less Than a Merger
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The doctrine of successor jurisdiction provides that when two entities merge, the successor entity inherits the merged entity’s jurisdictional status for purposes of specific jurisdiction ( i.e. , personal jurisdiction). Thus, if the merged entity was subject to jurisdiction in a particular forum, then the successor would also be subject to the court’s jurisdiction, regardless of whether the successor entity would otherwise be subject to the court’s juris
admin
Apr 22, 202410 min read


Standing in Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Actions and the Applicability of RPAPL 1302-a to Defaulting Borrower
In order to prosecute a lawsuit, the plaintiff must have standing to do so. Standing involves a determination of whether the party seeking relief has a sufficiently cognizable stake in the outcome so as to cast the dispute in a form traditionally capable of judicial resolution.

Jonathan Freiberger
Apr 19, 20245 min read
Breach of Contract Claim Sustained Where Plaintiff Offered a Facially Reasonable Reading of The Contract
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The foundation of virtually every business and commercial transaction is a contract. It is difficult to imagine a transaction for the purchase or sale of goods, the merger or acquisition of a business, or the provision of services that is not based upon a contract. There is almost nothing more costly to businesses and their owners than a dispute regarding the meaning of a contract. Such disputes often arise over the performance or non-performance of a te
admin
Apr 15, 20247 min read
New York City Sparkies Beware – Be Licensed or be Square
By Jonathan H. Freiberger This BLOG has previously addressed issues related to proper licensure for contractors and the problems that arise for them if they perform work without a license. See, e.g. , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . We have previously noted that home improvement contractors are frequently required by municipalities to be licensed. Unlicensed home improvement contractors are precluded from collecting payments due from ho
admin
Apr 12, 20244 min read
Enforcement News: SEC Underscores Importance of Compliance With Recordkeeping Rules
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The federal securities laws impose recordkeeping requirements on registered investment advisers to ensure that they responsibly discharge their roles in the nation’s markets. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) has long said that compliance with these requirements is essential to investor protection and to the Commission’s efforts to further its mandate of protecting investors, maintaining fair, orderly, and efficient markets, a
admin
Apr 10, 20244 min read
Can an Accountant Hired to Perform “Compilation Services” be Shielded from Liability for the Alleged Improper Activities of a Corporate Officer?
By Jeffery Haber There are four primary levels of services provided by an accountant with respect to an entity’s financial statements: preparation, compilation, review, and audit. A preparation engagement is a basic one. In this level of service, the accountant assists management or the business owner in preparing financial statements for internal use. In a compilation engagement, the accountant assists management or the business owner in the presentation of the entity’s fi
admin
Apr 8, 20246 min read
The Doctrine of Corporation by Estoppel
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Whether a non-existent corporation can enter into a contract is an interesting question. The interesting answer is that sometimes it can. Pursuant to BCL § 403 , a corporation’s existence begins “ pon the filing of the certificate of incorporation by the department of state.” Generally, “a nonexistent entity cannot acquire rights or assume liabilities, a corporation which has not yet been formed normally lacks capacity to enter into a contract.” Ru
admin
Apr 5, 20245 min read
bottom of page
