By: Jeffrey M. Haber “The right to a trial by jury is governed by article I (§ 2) of the New York State Constitution,” which provides “that a ‘ rial by jury in all cases in which it has heretofore been guaranteed by constitutional provision shall remain inviolate forever.’” 1 Enacted in 1938, “ his provision, …, is generally interpreted to mean that the guarantee extends to all matters to which the prior Constitution, enacted in 1894, extended the guarantee.” 2 “This includ

By Jonathan H. Freiberger This Blog has recently written on the issue of contractual limitations of liability. < Here ="><em>Here</em></a><em>"> Proving that timing is everything, Jonathan H. Freiberger, one of Freiberger Haber LLP’s founding members, was interviewed for, and quoted in, an August 1, 2023, article appearing in Hotel News Now, titled: “Is Extreme Tourism Responsible Tourism? Hotels Catering to Adventurous Guests Seek to Limit Liability Exposure.” Hotel News N

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Defamation is broadly defined as any false statement that harms the reputation of a person, business, or organization. It is a false statement “‘that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion or disgrace.’” 1 Defamation includes both libel and slander. Libel generally refers to defamatory statements that are published or broadcast in writing, while slander refers to statements that are verbally made. To state a cause of acti

By: Jeffrey M. Haber The law can be funny. Not in a comedic way, but in a way that defies expectations about what is needed to bring a cause of action. Sometimes this is manifested in the quantum of evidence needed to bring an action and survive a pre-answer motion to dismiss. Other times, it is manifested in the capacity or standing of the plaintiff to commence the action. In Greco v. Syracuse ASC, LLC , 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 03987 (4th Dept., July 28, 2023) ( here ), the Appel

By Jonathan H. Freiberger As discussed in a prior blog article < here =">here</a>"> , a notice of pendency (or lis pendens) is a provisional remedy governed by Article 65 of the CPLR. The Court of Appeals, in 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp. , 64 N.Y.2d 313 (1984), one of the leading cases on the subject, described the a notice of pendency as a: potent shield to protect litigants claiming an interest in real property. The powerful impact that this device has on the a

By: Jeffrey M. Haber In Merchant Factors Corp. v. Crush Apparel & Accessories Inc. , 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 50755(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County July 21, 2023) ( here ), plaintiff, Merchant Factors Corp., a factoring and commercial financing services provider, brought suit against defendant Crush Apparel & Accessories Inc. (“Crush Apparel”), among others, 1 to recover for an allegedly fraudulent scheme to steal and divert millions of dollars in goods, services, and real property that

By: Jeffrey M. Haber In the merger and acquisition world it is common to form a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”). A SPAC is a company with no underlying business operations that is formed to raise capital through an initial public offering (“IPO”) for the purpose of using the proceeds to acquire an unidentified private operating company at a later date but within a specified period of time (typically two years). A SPAC is also known as a blank check company ( i.e.

By Jonathan H. Freiberger In most situations, the contemplated goal of a mortgage foreclosure action is the sale of the subject property at public auction pursuant to a judgment of foreclosure and sale. Once a sale occurs, however, can it be set aside? “A court has the inherent power to ensure that a sale conducted pursuant to a judgment of foreclosure is not made an instrument of injustice in the exercise of its equitable powers, has the discretion to set aside a judicia

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Most litigants think that financial documents, such as tax returns, are confidential. The same is true with regard to trade secrets and other proprietary business information. While those sentiments are most often true, as discussed below, litigants are, nevertheless, often surprised to learn that there are well-developed rules governing the protection of such information from public view. “Under New York law, there is a broad presumption that the public