top of page
All Posts
Enforcement News: SEC Charges Movie Actor With Unlawfully Touting Cryptocurrency Offering
Endorsements from the rich and famous, such as movie and television stars, professional athletes, and musicians, can be found on TV, radio, and social media. Virtually any product or service can be endorsed by a celebrity. Sometimes the endorsement concerns investment opportunities. But, as the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) has warned, “a celebrity endorsement does not mean that an investment is legitimate or that it is appropriate for all inv
admin
Mar 7, 20205 min read
Fraud Notes: Scienter and The Failure to Allege Falsity
Many cases involving an alleged fraud typically rise and fall on the reliance element of the cause of action. Sometimes, the issue before the court is the state of mind of the alleged fraudster. While at other times, the issue concerns whether the defendant made a misrepresentation of material fact. In today’s Fraud Notes, we examine Cohen Bros. Realty Corp. v. Mapes , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 01440 (1st Dept. Mar. 3, 2020) ( here ), a case involving the state of mind element of a
admin
Mar 5, 20208 min read
Have A Breach Of Contract Claim? Don’t Forget To Identify The Provision Alleged To Be Breached – Part II
In a prior post ( here ), this Blog discussed Barrett v. Grenda , 2017 NY Slip Op. 07031 (4th Dept. Oct. 6, 2017), a case in which the court dismissed a breach of contract claim because the plaintiff failed to identify the provision of an agreement alleged to have been breached. In NFA Group v. Lotus Research, Inc. , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 01356 (2d Dept. Feb. 26, 2020) ( here ), the Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed the dismissal of a breach of contract action for t
admin
Mar 2, 20203 min read
REVIVE A TIME-BARRED CLAIM USING § 17-101 OF NEW YORK’S GENERAL OBLIGATIONS LAW
In general, statutes of limitation govern the time in which a cause of action must be interposed after accrual. [This BLOG has previously addressed Statute of Limitations issues < HERE =">HERE</a>"> and < HERE =">HERE</a>"> .] Article 2 of the CPLR addresses statute of limitations issues in New York. Section 201 of the CPLR provides that “ n action … must be commenced within the time specified in this article unless a different time is prescribed by law or a shorter time
admin
Feb 28, 20207 min read
First Department Affirms Dismissal of Action Involving a Wire Transfer Between Non-U.S. Parties on Forum Non Conveniens Grounds
Forum non conveniens is a common law doctrine in which a court may dismiss an action because adjudication of the matter is more appropriate in another forum. In New York, the doctrine can be found in CPLR § 327(a). Under this section, a court may stay or dismiss an action if it finds “that in the interest of substantial justice the action should be heard in another forum.” CPLR § 327(a). The party seeking dismissal bears the burden of establishing that New York is not the pr
admin
Feb 26, 20205 min read
N.Y. Supreme Court Rules on Alleged Fraudulent Conveyance and the Attempt to Evade Creditors
In very general terms, fraudulent conveyance statutes are designed to protect creditors from situations where a debtor transfers its assets or property to a creditor’s detriment. Sometimes such transfers are made with actual intent to defraud. Other times, transfers may be deemed to be constructively fraudulent regardless of the actual intent of the debtor/transferor. In Sarfati v. Palazzolo , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 30432(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Feb. 7, 2020) ( here ), Justic
admin
Feb 24, 202012 min read
SUPREME COURT, NEW YORK COUNTY, DENIES MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR EMAIL COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN EMPLOYEES AND THEIR ATTORNEY MADE OVER EMPLOYERS’ EMAIL SYSTEM
People text and e-mail all day and every day. When communicating from a personal smart phone, a privately-owned personal computer or over a personal e-mail network, concerns over privacy are minimized. However, folks do a fair share of their personal business while at work -- often utilizing their work e-mail systems, smart phones and personal computers for same. While convenient, such practices could present problems as an employer may be permitted to have access to infor
admin
Feb 21, 20204 min read
Fraud Notes: Real Estate Fraud and the Misrepresentation of Material Facts
In today’s Fraud Notes, we look at two fraud cases involving real estate: Lash v. Schleider , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 30406(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Feb. 11, 2020) ( here ); and Goff v. Parker , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 30396(U) (Sup. Ct., Suffolk County Feb. 10, 2020) ( here ). Lash v. Schleider Lash arose from a contract between plaintiffs, Lori Lash, Robert Lash, and Goldsholle, LLC (“Goldsholle”), and the moving defendants, Jeffrey Schleider (“Schleider”) and Miron Properties, LLC
admin
Feb 19, 20205 min read
Enforcement News: SEC Charges Broker with Scheme to Defraud Mostly Elderly Retail Brokerage Customers and Investment Advisory Clients
Elder financial exploitation is a significant problem. Everyone reading this article may be affected in some way. Our family, friends, neighbors, colleagues, and/or customers may fall victim to financial exploitation. All of us are at risk of being financially abused and/or exploited as we grow older. Seniors are Particularly Vulnerable to Financial Abuse and Exploitation Research indicates that as seniors grow older, they become too trusting and fail to recognize false or mi
admin
Feb 17, 20207 min read
MIND THE GAP – RENEWAL JUDGMENTS UNDER CPLR § 5014
In New York State, money judgments are valid for 20 years. CPLR § 211(b) . Money judgments recorded in the county in which real property is located remain liens on that real property for only 10 years. CPLR § 5203(a) . The CPLR, however, permits a judgment creditor to obtain a “renewal judgment,” which would operate to extend the lien of a money judgment on real property for an additional 10-year period. CPLR § 5014 . Thus, CPLR § 5014 presently provides, in pertinent p
admin
Feb 14, 20205 min read
Court Finds Promise of Future Performance and Anti-Reliance Provision in Merger Clause Preclude Fraudulent Inducement Affirmative Defense
On February 6, 2020, Justice Jennifer G. Schecter of the Supreme Court, New York County issued a decision in which she ruled, among other things, that Kesha Rose Sebert (better known by her stage name as Kesha) defamed Lukasz Gottwald (“Gottwald”), the music producer known as Dr. Luke, and Kesha’s former producer, when she claimed, in a text message to Lady Gaga, that he had raped Katy Perry. Gottwald v. Sebert , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 30347(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Feb. 6, 2020
admin
Feb 12, 20207 min read
Fraud Notes: N.Y. Supreme Courts Address Fraud and Fraudulent Inducement Claims
Readers of this Blog know that we like to write about fraud cases. After all, a fraud can be perpetrated in so many contexts. Indeed, the circumstances upon which one can deceive another are limited only by the imagination of the wrongdoer. Sometimes, there are too many reported decisions for us to examine in the depth to which our readers have become accustomed. For this reason, we have created the “Fraud Notes” post in which we will examine multiple decisions addressing fra
admin
Feb 10, 20209 min read
THE SECOND DEPARTMENT DECIDES INTERESTING ISSUES UNDER RPAPL §1304
On numerous occasions, this Blog has addressed issues surrounding certain notice obligations imposed on mortgage lenders foreclosing on residential property. For example, section 1303 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (“RPAPL”) requires that, under certain circumstances relating to residential property, a foreclosing mortgagee must send statutory notice to the mortgagor and tenants advising them, among other things, that they are in danger of losing their hom
admin
Feb 7, 20204 min read
Fourth Department Vacates Portion of Arbitral Award Because Arbitrator Exceeded His Authority
In New York, arbitration, like other alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, is valid and enforceable. Westinghouse v. New York City Tr. Auth. , 82 N.Y.2d 47, 54 (1993) (“Considerable authority thus supports the validity and enforceability of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.”). Like many jurisdictions, New York has a strong public policy that favors arbitration. In fact, arbitration is not only favored but encouraged “as an effective and expeditious means of reso
admin
Feb 5, 20204 min read
Enforcement News: SEC Charges Accountant with Affinity Fraud
Investment scams come in many forms. Affinity fraud is one type of investment scam. In this form of fraud, the person committing the fraud preys upon members of an identifiable group, such as a religious or ethnic community, the elderly, or a professional group. The promoter of an affinity fraud frequently is – or pretends to be – a member or a good friend of the group. The fraudster often enlists respected members of the community or religious leaders from within the group t
admin
Feb 3, 20205 min read
NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ANALYZES WHETHER AN “OWNER” CAN ALSO BE A “CONTRACTOR” FOR LIEN LAW TRUST FUND DIVERSION PURPOSES
In this Blog’s post entitled: “ Real Property Owners and Contractors should be Aware of the Trust Fund Provisions of New York’s Lien Law ,” the trust fund provisions of New York’s lien law were discussed. A brief recap of this Blog’s prior post as it relates to this post may be informative. Lien Law §71 recognizes two types of trusts – (1) the owner trust and (2) the contractor/subcontractor trust. The assets of the owner trust “shall be held and applied to the cost of im
admin
Jan 31, 20205 min read
Court Holds Text Message Inadmissible Evidence to Support Breach of Contract Claim
Commercial transactions by their nature involve contracts. Sometimes, the parties involved in such transactions will dispute the meaning of their agreement. It may be that the language used is ambiguous; or the language is reasonably clear but is susceptible to different meanings; or although the language is clear, taken literally, it might not reflect the parties’ intent; or, as is often the case, an event has occurred that was not contemplated by the parties at the time of
admin
Jan 29, 20208 min read
Statute of Limitations, The Continuing Wrong Doctrine and an Alleged Fraudulent Insurance Scheme
Statutes of limitations limit the duration of a defendant’s liability for all types of alleged wrongdoing. Plaintiffs who do not pursue their rights within the limitation period will find the courthouse doors closed to their claims. For this reason, whether the statute of limitations has run can be an important topic of discussion between a lawyer and her client. The statute of limitations for a fraudulent inducement claim is the greater of (a) six years from the date when t
admin
Jan 27, 202011 min read
bottom of page
