This Blog has previously examined the different aspects of a shareholder’s derivative action, such as the standing requirements and the distinction between direct and derivative claims. ( Here , here and here .) Today’s article revisits these issues. The Demand Futility Requirement Under Delaware law, to have standing to bring a derivative claim on behalf of a corporation, a plaintiff “must make a pre-suit demand that the board pursue the contemplated action.” Asbestos Wor

Contract provisions containing deadlines for giving notice of an event or occurrence, such as a claimed default, are key parts of commercial transactions. These provisions vary from contract to contract, often requiring different forms of notice and different timing requirements for notice to be given on different issues. Not surprisingly, notice provisions, and compliance with these provisions, are often a basis for disputes. Recently, the Delaware Court of Chancery undersc

In Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc. v. Grand Automotive, Inc. d/b/a Planet Mitsubishi , the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted Mitsubishi Motors North America’s (“Mitsubishi”) request for a preliminary injunction pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mitsubishi distributes its vehicles through a network of authorized dealerships that are authorized to “sell and provide services relating to…Mitsubishi motor veh

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has been busy so far this month. In the latest roundup, this Blog looks at three enforcement actions taken by the SEC against hedge funds and advisers involving fraud and insider trading. Hedge Fund Advisory Firm Settles Charges Related to Asset Mismarking and Insider Trading On May 8, 2018, the SEC announced ( here ) that New York-based Visium Asset Management LP (“Visium”), a hedge fund advisory firm, agreed to settle charges r

A client contacts you about a potential fraud claim. The client tells you that because of alleged false statements, she decided to hold her securities rather than sell them. She says that as result of the false statements she was deprived of the opportunity to sell at a higher price and, therefore, suffered damages when the securities declined upon the disclosure of the truth. Does she have a case? Recently, Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich of the Supreme Court, New County,

On several occasions, this Blog has treated issues related to problems faced by mortgagees foreclosing on certain residential loans. “ Appellate Division Second Department Tells Foreclosing Residential Lender to ‘SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE’ ” addressed the sufficiency of evidence necessary for a foreclosing lender to demonstrate compliance with the requirement under RPAPL §1304 that ninety days prior to the commencement of an action to foreclose a home loan, a lender must send a

Jonathan H. Freiberger, a member of the law firm of Freiberger Haber LLP , was selected by the Queens Economic Development Corporation (“QEDC”) to be a judge in the 2018 Queens StartUP! Competition, a signature program of the QEDC that provides Queens-based small business owners and aspiring entrepreneurs with business education, mentoring, access to capital and development of business skills. In his role as a judge, Mr. Freiberger reviewed, analyzed and provided feedback

It is not uncommon for a person or entity holding money to be placed in a situation where multiple parties claim entitlement to the funds being held. Given the competing claims to the funds, the holder can wait for the parties to resolve their dispute or file an interpleader action asking the court to decide who should get the funds being held. An interpleader action “is an equitable proceeding” brought by a third party to have a court determine the ownership rights of multi

A shareholder is a part owner of a company. While many people understand this very basic concept in business matters , they may not realize what kinds of rights and responsibilities come along with being a shareholder. Shareholders in private companies generally have the same rights as they would in a public company, but they may be enforced differently. A New York business lawyer can help you understand the difference and even assert your rights should you feel that you are

E.J.Brooks Company d/b/a TydenBrooks (“TydenBrooks” or “Plaintiff”) manufactures plastic security seals (“Seals”). When TydenBrooks acquired Stoffel Seals Corp. (“Stoffel”) it came to own Stoffel’s fully automated, and confidential, process for manufacturing Seals. Some TydenBrooks employees “defected to a rival manufacturer, Cambridge Security Seals (“CSS”), and brought with them TydenBrooks’ confidential Seal manufacturing process. TydenBrooks then commenced an action in

It is well settled that arbitration is a favored means of resolving disputes. See , e.g. , CPLR § 7501 (“A written agreement to submit any controversy . . . to arbitration is enforceable without regard to the justiciable character of the controversy and confers jurisdiction on the courts of the state to enforce it and to enter judgment on an award.”); Harris v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc. , 82 A.D. 2d 87, 91-93 (1st Dep’t), aff’d , 56 N.Y.2d 627 (1981) (“ his State favors and

On April 24, 2018, the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) announced that Altaba, Inc. (“Altaba”), the successor in interest to Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo”), agreed to pay $35 million to settle charges that it misled investors by failing to disclose that hundreds of millions of user accounts had been hacked, resulting in the theft of sensitive user personal data. ( Here .) The settlement follows the issuance of the SEC’s cybersecurity disclosure guidance for repo

In Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet , Juliet utters the oft quoted phrase, “parting is such sweet sorrow,” when saying goodnight to Romeo. While Juliet may have been upset that Romeo was leaving for the evening, the thought that she would see him again, and that she would be able to imagine their next meeting, made the parting “sweet”. The Decision and Order issued by the New York Supreme Court (Kornreich, J.) in Young Adult Institute, Inc., et al. v. The Corporate Source, In

On April 9, 2018, Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich of the Supreme Court, New York County, Commercial Division granted a motion for summary judgment involving claims that the defendant owed the plaintiff nearly $3.5 million in connection with investment in more than 800 derivatives transactions over a four-year period. In granting the motion, Justice Kornreich had some harsh words about the strength of the defenses proffered in opposition to the motion. INTL FCStone Mkts., LL

New York creditors often look to the Debtor and Creditor Law (the “DCL”), as well as the common law, to recover assets that have been (or may be) transferred by debtors to another party. Whether the debtor transfers assets with intent to defraud or without fair consideration, the DCL provides creditors with a number of remedies. The DCL in Brief Under Section 276 of the DCL, very conveyance made ... with actual intent ... to hinder, delay, or defraud either present or future

One of the first things students are taught in law school is that, to be valid, a contract must be supported by consideration. In Reddy v. Mihos (April 17, 2017), the Appellate Division, First Department, analyzed the need for a guaranty to be supported by proper consideration. The plaintiff in Reddy was an experienced real estate investor. Defendant Mihos, an attorney, represented plaintiff in numerous real estate transactions over an extended period of time. Plaintiff

Recently, this Blog wrote about the law governing the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets. ( Here .) As noted in that post, with the exception of New York and Massachusetts, the protection of trade secrets is generally governed by the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“UTSA”). In those two states, however, the protection of trade secrets is governed by the common law. Generally, trade secret owners have recourse only against the misappropriation of a trade secret. Misappropr

It is not uncommon for drafters of contracts and statutes to use the word “notwithstanding” to establish precedence over other provisions in the document. Cisneros v. Alpine Ridge Group , 508 U.S. 10, 18 (1993) (The “use of . . . a ‘notwithstanding’ clause … signals the drafter’s intention that the provisions of the ‘notwithstanding’ section override conflicting provisions of any other section.”). As such, the word “notwithstanding” is considered to be a trumping word that “