top of page


Fraud Notes: Timeliness in Fraud Litigation – Discovery Rule Saves Some Claims, Bars Others
In today’s Fraud Notes, we examine two recent appellate court decisions that highlight the role statutes of limitations play in fraud-based claims. Specifically, we explore how New York courts evaluate timeliness under CPLR 213(8), including the six-year limitations period and the two-year discovery rule, as well as the three-year limitations period governing General Business Law § 349 claims.

Jeffrey Haber
Jun 267 min read


Plaintiff’s Allegations and Records Show Its Claim Was Time Barred
In Southgate Owners Corp. v. Esposito, 2025 N.Y. Slip Op. 32750(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County July 24, 2025), plaintiff sued defendant, a shareholder in its cooperative building, seeking a declaratory judgment that 80 additional shares had been properly allocated to her unit following a 1996 expansion of her unit into terrace space.

Jeffrey Haber
Aug 18, 20255 min read
bottom of page
