On September 29, 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) announced that International Gaming Technology (“IGT”), a casino-gaming company, agreed to pay $500,000 to settle charges of retaliating against one of its executives with several years of positive performance reviews because he reported to senior management and the SEC concerns about the accuracy of IGT’s financial statements. According to the SEC’s order, within weeks of raising co

On September 14, 2016, Andrew Ceresney (“Ceresney”), Director, Division of Enforcement of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or “Commission”), spoke at the Sixteenth Annual Taxpayers Against Fraud Conference in Washington, D.C. Ceresney covered a lot of ground during his presentation, addressing issues such as the impact of the whistleblower program to the role of whistleblowers and their attorneys in the investigation and claims process. Impact of the Whistleb

What is being done about fraud in the FHA's mortgage insurance program? In September, the U.S. Department of Justice announced that Regions Bank ("Regions") agreed to pay $52.4 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act. The Alabama-based bank knowingly originated mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration ("FHA") that did not meet the underwriting guidelines of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"). What is a

By Jeffrey M. Haber How has Turing managed to get into even more trouble after last year's bombshell? It is difficult to imagine Martin Shkreli ("Shkreli") being shamed even more than he already has been, nor Turing Pharmaceuticals AG ("Turing") having its reputation further blackened by more bad news. Nonetheless, this is exactly what's happening. After last fall's commotion surrounding pricing discrepancies, Nancy Retzlaff ("Retzlaff"), once looked at as the most likely can

By Jeffrey M. Haber How many awards has the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") made under its whistleblower program? The CFTC awarded a whistleblower $50,000, the second such award this year. The $50,000 award comes on the heels of a $10 million award earlier in 2016, the largest award under its program to date. Authority Under the Dodd-Frank Act The whistleblower award program created under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank

By: Jeffrey Haber In 2010, Congress passed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act” or the “Act”) to combat illegal and fraudulent conduct on Wall Street and promote compliance with the federal securities. The Dodd-Frank Act contains whistleblower provisions that authorize the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”) to pay substantial cash rewards to whistleblowers that voluntarily provide the SEC with informa

By Jeffrey M. Haber The False Claims Act (“FCA” or the “Act”) prohibits businesses and individuals from defrauding the government by knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment or approval. Currently, violations of the Act can result in a judgment equal to three times the losses sustained by the government, plus civil penalties of $5,500 to $11,000 for each false claim. The Act rewards whistleblowers (also known as “relators”) who successfully

By Jeffrey M. Haber New York, New York — July 21, 2016 Jeffrey M. Haber, Esq., an attorney with over twenty-five years of experience litigating complex matters on behalf of institutions and individuals at law firms having a national practice, is proud to announce the opening of his new law firm, The Law Office of Jeffrey M. Haber. The Law Office of Jeffrey M. Haber is dedicated to the representation of corporations, small businesses and high net worth individuals involved in

By Jeffrey M. Haber On June 22, 2016, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed a Notice of Supplemental Authority in U.S. ex rel. Westrick v. Second Chance Body Armor, et al., No. 04-0280 (D.D.C.), a case brought under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) against contractors who manufactured and sold bullet proof vests. The purpose of the filing was to notify the court of the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous decision in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar,

Summary On June 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Escobar, a Medicaid case involving the “implied certification” theory of liability under the False Claims Act (“FCA”). The “implied false certification” theory provides that a defendant may violate the FCA by failing to disclose noncompliance with a relevant statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirement. In Escobar, the Court unanimously confirmed that the th

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Catastrophic events often bring out the best in people. Sometimes, however, such events bring out the worst in people. The events that followed Hurricane Katrina stand as reminders of the latter, at least according to Cori and Kerri Rigsby, two sisters who filed a False Claims Act ("FCA") complaint against State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. ("State Farm"), among others. The Rigsby sisters, two experienced claims adjusters, alleged that State Farm and other