Search Results

This saying best describes the duplication of claims doctrine that this Blog often writes about – that is, the doctrine whereby a fraud claim will duplicate a contract claim when “the only fraud alleged Under the duplication of claims doctrine, the fraud claims could not stand side-by-side with the lease

again discuss summary judgment in lieu of complaint pursuant to CPLR 3213, which provides, in relevant part Kitchen Winners, 226 A.D.3d at 991 (citations, internal quotation marks and brackets omitted). Pearl River. 240 A.D.3d at 611-12 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.) (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.)

Hall, 185 A.D.3d 1006, 1007 (2nd Dep’t 2020) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Taylor, 230 A.D.3d 457, 458 (2nd Dep’t 2024) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Deutsche Bank, 185 A.D.3d at 1008 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted; hyperlink added). (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.) (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.) Jonathan H.

TWR Express, Inc., 11 A.D.3d 513, 514 (2nd Dep’t 2004) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted Rocar, 38 A.D.3d at 746 (citations, internal quotation marks and ellipses omitted). Schwartz, 209 A.D.3d 30, 40 (2nd Dep’t 2022) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Hudson Home Group, LLC, 206 A.D.3d 585, 587 (1st Dep’t 2022) (citations and internal quotation marks (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.)

3016(b), the statute of limitations applicable to fraud claims, breach of contract and the duplication doctrine

The Vocal Arranger Agreement also contained a provision that permitted L&S to assign “all or any part therefore subject to its arbitration clause.” 12 The Court also held, without stating the applicable doctrine Sacharow , 91 N.Y.2d 39, 49 (1997) (citations and quotation marks omitted); Stark v. Stark , 9 N.Y.3d at 66 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

ill will.’” [33]  The Court explained that plaintiff “established that defendant’s statements were part Abel , 10 N.Y.3d 271, 276 (2008) (internal quotation marks omitted). [7]   See Liberman v. 437. [17]   Stega,  at 670 (quoting, Liberman , 80 N.Y.2d at 437-438). [18]   Id. [19]   Id. [20]   Park (quoting Liberman , 80 N.Y.2d at 439 (internal quotation marks omitted), and citing  Pezhman v.

Kohlmeyer , 35 N.Y.2d 402, 405 (1974) (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Singer v. (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Id. (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Id. (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Id. (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).

Pescatore Parking, Inc. , 105 A.D.3d 594, 595 (1st Dept. 2013) ( quoting Allen , 21 N.Y.2d at 407) (internal things or items of testimony … or from using certain witnesses”; or, (3) “striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or any part Further, a particular judge’s individual part rules may also provide related (and important) guidance

Forum non conveniens is a common law doctrine in which a court may dismiss an action because adjudication In New York, the doctrine can be found in CPLR § 327(a). In New York, the seminal case discussing the doctrine is Islamic Republic of Iran v. Takeaway The forum non conveniens doctrine permits a court to dismiss an action when “in the interest It is a flexible doctrine that is based upon the facts and circumstances of each case.

(Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.) (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.) (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.) (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.) [Citations, internal quotation marks and brackets omitted.]

inventory lists and valuations presented to Metropolitan to support the loan included non-existent parts fraud claims “were not duplicative to the breach of contract claims.” [9] Courts apply the duplication doctrine