Search Results
393 results found for "whistleblower representation"
- Dismissal of Securities Fraud Claim in Federal Court Has No Preclusive Effect on Common Law Fraud Claims Brought in State Court
Defendants also allegedly represented that the investment would be worth tens of millions of dollars – a representation
- Agritech, Inc. v. Resh: U.S. Supreme Court Holds Equitable Tolling Not Applicable to the Filing of Successive Class Actions
consider ‘additional applications rather than deny class certification,’ thus ‘afford the best possible representation
- Damages in a Holder Claim Found to Be Too Speculative For Recovery
plaintiffs alleged “a definite, measurable, out-of-pocket loss … due to the alleged false post-offering representations
- International Gaming Technology Agrees to Pay $500,000 to Settle Charges of Unlawfully Retaliating Against One of Its Executives
that the company’s cost accounting was arbitrarily inflated, senior managers retaliated against the whistleblower IGT terminated the whistleblower approximately three months later, following the conclusion of an internal investigation into the whistleblower’s allegations. Section 21F(h) of the Act protects whistleblowers who provide information to the SEC about violations Norberg, Chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower.
- Finra's Record Haul in 2016
(This Blog recently discussed possible implications with respect to the SEC whistleblower program here
- Variable Annuity Investor Awarded $1 Million in Finra Arbitration
If you are an investor who is seeking to bring a claim, or an investment adviser in need of representation
- Supreme Court Reinstates Lawsuit Against Banks Under The Implied Certification Theory
conditions are satisfied: (1) the defendant does not merely request payment, but also makes specific representations disclose noncompliance with material statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirements makes those representations
- When a Term Sheet is Not an Enforceable Contract
disclaimer will defeat any allegation that the contract was executed in reliance upon contrary oral representations Based in part on the verbal representations, Pate maintained that he understood that the merger clause of the merger clause, stating: “the allegation that plaintiff justifiably relied on pre-contractual representations contract containing a specific merger clause that disclaims prior or extra-contractual agreements or representations will bar the parties from relying upon such agreements or representations to assert claims of breach
- Court Rules That The Failure To Read An Insurance Policy Does Not Bar A Claim For Failure To Obtain Insurance
properties was available from the FEMA; and (3) whether plaintiffs’ reliance on defendant’s unqualified representation
- Deutsche Bank Employees Granted Class Certification in 401(k) Lawsuit
While the subject matter of class actions can vary widely, certain factors must be present for a court As to the typicality and adequacy of representation elements, the Court found that the Plaintiffs satisfied entire class period – challenge Defendants’ process for selecting and retaining the investment options presented
- The Sec Awards $22 Million to a Company Insider Who Helped Uncover a Well-hidden Fraud
The $22.5 million award is the second-largest the SEC has awarded a whistleblower since the program’s Among other things, the SEC recognized the “extensive assistance” provided by the whistleblower in “help The whistleblower’s attorney told news outlets that the whistleblower, a finance executive at Monsanto Commenting on the award, Jane Norberg, Acting Chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower, said: The largest amount awarded to a whistleblower by the SEC was $30 million in 2014.
- Is The Two-Part Test Created In Escobar The Exclusive Means For Establishing Implied Certification Liability?
conditions are satisfied: (1) the defendant does not merely request payment, but also makes specific representations disclose noncompliance with material statutory, regulatory, or contractual requirements makes those representations Nov. 14, 2016), the court held that “ Escobar cannot be read to impose the ‘specific representations certification claim to proceed even though the defendant did “not use payment codes” or “contain specific representations which it expressly declined to decide whether a claim for payment could itself constitute an implicit representation
