court granting the plaintiffs’ motion to strike the defendants’ answer and for leave to enter a default judgment plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the defendants’ answer and for leave to enter a default judgment

Structures Ltd. v UBS AG (77 AD3d 417 <1st dept 2010> ), which involved an oral agreement with “methods of acceleration

After discovery was completed and a note of issue was filed, the parties filed motions for summary judgment

of the Supreme Court, New York County, Commercial Division, had the opportunity to rule on a summary judgment Following the completion of fact discovery, each party filed a motion for summary judgment. The Court’s Decision The court granted Schulhof’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Jacobs

On February 21, 2017, the Supreme Court vacated the judgment in  Bishop v.

On October 9, 2015, Kolmar moved for summary judgment on Lion’s causes of action. As result, the Court reversed the motion court’s denial of Kolmar’s summary judgment motion as to Lion

Ruocco : Consideration for The Issuance of Company Stock and The Board’s Business Judgment On December rule, the Second Department reversed the Supreme Court’s grant of summary judgment, finding issues In the absence of fraud in the transaction, the judgment of the board or shareholders, as the case may Second, the business judgment of the board of directors cannot be easily disturbed absent fraud, waste The “business judgment rule” presumes that the directors of a corporation will act in the corporation

Last year, the Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed and modified in part a post-trial judgment The Plaintiffs sought, among other things, to recover damages for breach of contract, and a judgment a separate decision, on May 28, 2009, the Supreme Court granted the Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment The parties appealed and cross-appealed the judgment.

Each side moved for summary judgment. substantial assistance to a breach of fiduciary duty, the Court denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment

Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced that it “obtained more than $4.7 billion in settlements and judgments The government recovered “nearly $1.7 billion in fiscal year 2016” from “ ettlements and judgments in 2009 to the end of fiscal year 2016, the government recovered nearly $24 billion in settlements and judgments

Thereafter, the parties moved for partial summary judgment. In granting partial summary judgment, the court rejected RHCT’s illegality argument because it was not

Thereafter, Stonehill moved for summary judgment, and BOTW moved to dismiss and cross moved for summary judgment. The Supreme Court denied BOTW’s motion to dismiss and cross motion for summary judgment, and granted Stonehill’s motion for summary judgment on the breach of contract cause of action.