What is behind the lawsuit accusing Hitachi of Stealing Trade Secrets from Purolite? At the end of August, Purolite, an American water treatment company based in Pennsylvania, filed a lawsuit against the American branch of Japanese conglomerate Hitachi. According to Purolite, Hitachi violated the stipulations of a business agreement by sharing Purolite's confidential trade secrets concerning the decontamination of water, including water contaminated by radioactive waste. Pur

Practitioners involved in qui tam litigation often encounter questions concerning when the statute of limitations begins to run. Under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), the government (or relator) must file a suit not “more than 3 years after the date when facts material to the right of action are known or reasonably should have been known by the official of the United States charged with responsibility to act in the circumstances, but in no event more than 10 years after the da

What anticompetitive business actions are considered unfair? Amidst the recent commotion surrounding the wildly elevated prices of certain products sold by Mylan Pharmaceuticals ("Mylan"), New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is investigating whether the drug company has unfairly limited competition. Although Mylan has been accused of profiteering before, this time the product involved is EpiPen®, the emergency injector used for extreme emergency allergic reacti

On May 31, 2016, the Appellate Division, First Department, issued MP Cool Investments Ltd. v. Forkosh , 2016 NY Slip Op. 05944, a case involving allegations of fraud in connection with the production and sale of a commercial heating and ventilation system by an Israeli-based company. In the decision, the First Department unanimously affirmed the motion court’s dismissal of the plaintiff’s fraud claims because they were not pleaded with particularity, did not establish justif

When parties negotiate the terms of a contract, they cannot account for every contingency or event that may affect performance. To be sure, they try. But, it is simply not possible to account for every occurrence that might arise during the course of the contract. This inability, therefore, gives the parties wide latitude in the performance and enforcement of their contractual obligations. Underlying this discretion is the duty to act in good faith and with fair dealing.

An agency relationship occurs when a principal gives legal authority to an agent to act on the principal’s behalf when dealing with a third party, and obtains the agent’s consent to be subject to the principal’s control. See Restatement (Third) of Agency §1.01. An agency relationship is a fiduciary one, meaning the agent, acting within the scope of his/her authority, has to act in the best interests of the principal. Under such circumstances, the acts and deeds of the age

After a merger, which agreement controls when both companies have pre-existing contracts with a common third party? In May 2016, Stamford-based Charter Communications Inc. (“Charter”) completed its acquisition of Time Warner Cable (“TWC”), making it the second largest cable provider behind Comcast Corporation. At the time of the acquisition, TWC was the larger of the two companies. As such, TWC was able to negotiate more favorable rates and terms on carriage agreements wit

In today’s digital world, it is not uncommon for individuals and businesses to memorialize the terms of their oral agreements through email. But are such agreements enforceable? The answer depends on a couple of factors, including whether there is a writing that memorializes the material terms of the agreement. Oral agreements that cannot be performed within one year of the agreement must be in writing. This broad rule, contained in the statute of frauds, is intended to “p

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Is it a breach of contract to bypass an agreed-upon, independent alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) process and commence an arbitration proceeding elsewhere? When two companies enter into a contract, it’s common to include language wherein both parties consent to having any disputes related to the contract decided by an agreed-upon, neutral third party, rather than by a judge in a lengthy, formal court proceeding. The process of ADR-- which may be by

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Damages Or Rescission . . . It Makes A Difference. Most people think that they are entitled only to monetary relief when they are the victim of fraud. That, however, is not always the case. Sometimes rescission – that is, returning to the status quo ante – is the appropriate form of relief. Indeed, there are times when a victim of fraud would rather be in the position he/she was in before the fraud occurred. When that happens, can the victim of fraud