top of page
All Posts
Second Department Rejects Buyer’s Cause of Action for Specific Performance
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Specific Performance is an equitable remedy used to compel a party to perform under a contract. McGinnis v. Cowhey , 24 A.D.3d 629 (2 nd Dep’t 2005). Specific Performance is frequently used to enforce a party’s rights under real estate contracts. This Blog has previously discussed specific performance. See, e.g. , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . In EMF General Contracting Corp. v.
admin
Aug 11, 20236 min read
The Attorney-Client Privilege: Common Interest Doctrine and Communications By Corporate Representatives Which Convey Legal Advice
By: Jeffrey M. Haber On numerous occasions, this Blog has examined the attorney-client privilege and the attorney work product doctrine. 1 Today, we take another opportunity to explore the contours of these privileges. The Tension Between Disclosure and The Attorney-Client Privilege The Civil Practice Law and Rules (“CPLR”) directs that there shall be “full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action.” 2 Notwithstanding, the CP
admin
Aug 9, 20237 min read
Joining Legal and Equitable Claims Waives The Right to a Trial by Jury
By: Jeffrey M. Haber “The right to a trial by jury is governed by article I (§ 2) of the New York State Constitution,” which provides “that a ‘ rial by jury in all cases in which it has heretofore been guaranteed by constitutional provision shall remain inviolate forever.’” 1 Enacted in 1938, “ his provision, …, is generally interpreted to mean that the guarantee extends to all matters to which the prior Constitution, enacted in 1894, extended the guarantee.” 2 “This includ
admin
Aug 7, 20235 min read
Extreme Vacations and Limitations of Liability
By Jonathan H. Freiberger This Blog has recently written on the issue of contractual limitations of liability. < Here ="><em>Here</em></a><em>"> Proving that timing is everything, Jonathan H. Freiberger, one of Freiberger Haber LLP’s founding members, was interviewed for, and quoted in, an August 1, 2023, article appearing in Hotel News Now, titled: “Is Extreme Tourism Responsible Tourism? Hotels Catering to Adventurous Guests Seek to Limit Liability Exposure.” Hotel News N
admin
Aug 4, 20235 min read
There is No Absolute Privilege to Defame Another in Court Papers
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Defamation is broadly defined as any false statement that harms the reputation of a person, business, or organization. It is a false statement “‘that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion or disgrace.’” 1 Defamation includes both libel and slander. Libel generally refers to defamatory statements that are published or broadcast in writing, while slander refers to statements that are verbally made. To state a cause of acti
admin
Aug 2, 20239 min read
Case of First Impression in the Appellate Division: Data Breach By Itself is Not An “Injury-in-Fact”
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The law can be funny. Not in a comedic way, but in a way that defies expectations about what is needed to bring a cause of action. Sometimes this is manifested in the quantum of evidence needed to bring an action and survive a pre-answer motion to dismiss. Other times, it is manifested in the capacity or standing of the plaintiff to commence the action. In Greco v. Syracuse ASC, LLC , 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 03987 (4th Dept., July 28, 2023) ( here ), the Appel
admin
Jul 31, 20236 min read
Notices of Pendency
By Jonathan H. Freiberger As discussed in a prior blog article < here =">here</a>"> , a notice of pendency (or lis pendens) is a provisional remedy governed by Article 65 of the CPLR. The Court of Appeals, in 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp. , 64 N.Y.2d 313 (1984), one of the leading cases on the subject, described the a notice of pendency as a: potent shield to protect litigants claiming an interest in real property. The powerful impact that this device has on the a
admin
Jul 28, 20235 min read
Factoring, Commercial Financing Services and Claims That Range from Replevin to Fraud
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In Merchant Factors Corp. v. Crush Apparel & Accessories Inc. , 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 50755(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County July 21, 2023) ( here ), plaintiff, Merchant Factors Corp., a factoring and commercial financing services provider, brought suit against defendant Crush Apparel & Accessories Inc. (“Crush Apparel”), among others, 1 to recover for an allegedly fraudulent scheme to steal and divert millions of dollars in goods, services, and real property that
admin
Jul 26, 202312 min read
Enforcement News: SPAC, Digital World Acquisition Corporation, Settles Charges With The SEC In Connection With IPO And Proposed Merger
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In the merger and acquisition world it is common to form a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”). A SPAC is a company with no underlying business operations that is formed to raise capital through an initial public offering (“IPO”) for the purpose of using the proceeds to acquire an unidentified private operating company at a later date but within a specified period of time (typically two years). A SPAC is also known as a blank check company (i.e.,
admin
Jul 24, 20235 min read
“All Foreclosure Sales Not Final”
By Jonathan H. Freiberger In most situations, the contemplated goal of a mortgage foreclosure action is the sale of the subject property at public auction pursuant to a judgment of foreclosure and sale. Once a sale occurs, however, can it be set aside? “A court has the inherent power to ensure that a sale conducted pursuant to a judgment of foreclosure is not made an instrument of injustice in the exercise of its equitable powers, has the discretion to set aside a judicia
admin
Jul 21, 20233 min read
The Presumption That Papers and Pleading Filed in Court are Public and The Circumstances in Which They May Be Sealed or Redacted
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Most litigants think that financial documents, such as tax returns, are confidential. The same is true with regard to trade secrets and other proprietary business information. While those sentiments are most often true, as discussed below, litigants are, nevertheless, often surprised to learn that there are well-developed rules governing the protection of such information from public view. “Under New York law, there is a broad presumption that the public
admin
Jul 19, 20236 min read
Fraud in Connection with the EB-5 Immigrant Investment Program
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In 1990, Congress created the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visa Program (“EB-5 Program”) to stimulate the U.S. economy through job creation and capital investment by foreign investors. The EB-5 Program offers foreign investors and members of their family an opportunity to obtain permanent residence in the United States ( i.e. , obtain a green card) and provides a source of financing for developers to use in, among other things, construction and business projec
admin
Jul 16, 202311 min read


To Settle an Order or Not to Settle an Order, That is the Question
On July 12, 2023, the Appellate Division, Second Department, in U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. v. Rahman, addressed an issue that has been confusing lawyers for quite some time involving 22 N.Y.C.R.R. §202.48

Jonathan Freiberger
Jul 14, 20234 min read
Recognition of Foreign Country Judgments and Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Under New York law, there are two methods by which a person can domesticate a foreign judgment – i.e. , a judgment obtained outside the State of New York. The first method is contained in Article 54 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules (“CPLR”), which codified the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act. Under CPLR § 5402(a), to recognize a foreign judgment, a judgment creditor must: (1) file the foreign judgment within 90 days of the date of the judg
admin
Jul 12, 20236 min read


Fraudulent Concealment and the Caveat Emptor Doctrine
The common law doctrine of caveat emptor is a well-accepted rule of law in New York. Under the doctrine, the courts will not impose liability on a seller of property for failing to disclose information material to the transaction when the parties deal at arm’s length, unless there is some conduct on the part of the seller which constitutes active concealment.

Jeffrey Haber
Jul 10, 20234 min read
Can You Limit Liability for Your Own Negligence in a Contract
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Folks sign contracts of all types that purport to contain limitations of liability; but are they enforceable. In many cases, the answer is “yes”. “In the absence of a contravening public policy, exculpatory provisions in a contract, purporting to insulate one of the parties from liability resulting from the party’s own negligence, although disfavored by the law and closely scrutinized by the courts, generally are enforced, subject however to variou
admin
Jul 7, 20233 min read
Factual Issues Prevent Summary Judgment Under the Voluntary Payment and Accord and Satisfaction Doctrines
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The voluntary payment doctrine bars recovery of payments voluntarily made with full knowledge of the facts, and in the absence of fraud or material mistake of fact or law. 1 Notably, there is a presumption that payments are voluntary. 2 Thus, to rebut the presumption, the plaintiff must show that he/she protested the payment. In order for a protest to be effective, it must be in writing and made at the time of payment. 3 In addition, the written protest
admin
Jul 5, 20237 min read
Fraud Notes: Fraud That Overcomes a Pleaded Defense and Impermissible Group Pleading
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Under the law, the perpetration of a fraud can be the great equalizer between winning and losing a case. For example, a court may relieve a party from the effects of a judgment against it upon, among other things, proof that the judgment was the result of the fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an adverse party. Similarly, a court may exercise its inherent power over its judgments to relieve a party from a judgment obtained through, among other th
admin
Jul 3, 202312 min read
bottom of page
