By Jonathan H. Freiberger Because there have been a number of appellate decisions interpreting RPAPL 1304 , this Blog has written frequently on that topic. See, e.g. , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . By way

By: Jeffrey M. Haber On many occasions, we have written about Ponzi schemes that have been the subject of enforcement actions brought by, and/or settlements with, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). E.g ., here , here , here , and here . It never ceases to amaze us how often people try to run a Ponzi scheme and do so by exploiting the trust and friendship that exist in groups of people who have something in common, such as a religious group, an

By: Jeffrey M. Haber Under Section 10(a) of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), a court will vacate an arbitral award for the following reasons: (1) the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; (2) there was evident partiality or corruption in the arbitrators . . . ; (3) the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct in refusing to postpone the hearing, or in refusing to hear evidence pertinent and material to the controversy, or of any other misbehavior by which

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Today’s Blog involves motions to renew and reargue and successive motions for summary judgment. When a motion is denied, a movant has several options. One can accept the loss and move on. An appeal can also be pursued. Additional options are also available under CPLR 2221 , which permits a movant to move for renewal or reargument. A motion to renew is “properly made to the motion court (CPLR 2221) to draw its attention to material facts which, al

By: Jeffrey M. Haber A “short sale” is the sale of a security that the seller does not own or any sale that is consummated by the delivery of a security borrowed by, or for the account of, the seller. In order to deliver the security to the purchaser, the short seller will borrow the security, typically from a broker-dealer or an institutional investor. The short seller later closes out the position by purchasing equivalent securities on the open market, or by using an equiva

A couple of months ago, we examined NW Media Holdings Corp. v. IBT Media Inc. , 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 30875(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Mar. 22, 2023) ( here ), a case in which a lower court addressed the question whether the destruction of millions of pages of data on a Google Workspace states a claim for trespass to chattels or conversion ( here ). As discussed in that article, the court concluded that the allegations concerning the destruction of such data sufficed to state a c

By Jonathan H. Freiberger Generally speaking, “term sheets” outline the basic terms of a transaction being negotiated by the parties thereto. This Blog has previously addressed the enforceability of “term sheets.” See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . On June 15, 2023, the Appellate Division, First Department, decided Parkmerced Investors, LLC v. WeWork Companie

By: Jeffrey M. Haber The doctrine of collateral estoppel prevents a party from relitigating an issue that was “raised, necessarily decided and material in the first action,” provided the party had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue. 1 Collateral estoppel is an equitable defense “grounded in the facts and realities of a particular litigation, rather than rigid rules.” 2 The proponent of collateral estoppel has the burden of demonstrating “the identicality and

By: Jeffrey M. Haber A common theme in commercial litigation is the assertion of a breach of contract claim and a fraudulent inducement claim. Where both claims are asserted, more times than not, the fraud claim is dismissed under the duplication of claims doctrine – a principle of law that stands for the proposition that a fraud claim cannot stand side-by-side with a breach of contract claim when there is “a valid and enforceable written contract govern a particular subje

By Jonathan H. Freiberger This Blog has frequently written about RPALP 1304 . By way of background, and as previously noted in this Blog, RPAPL 1304 requires that at least ninety days before commencing legal action against a borrower with respect to a “home loan” (as defined in the relevant statutes), a “lender, assignee or mortgage loan servicer” must: send written notice to the borrower by certified and regular mail that the loan is in default; provide a list of approved h

The internal affairs doctrine is a “conflict of laws principle which recognizes that only one State should have the authority to regulate a corporation’s internal affairs—matters peculiar to the relationships among or between the corporation and its current officers, directors, and shareholders—because otherwise a corporation could be faced with conflicting demands.”

By: Jeffrey Haber Section 3211(a)(8) of the Civil Practice Law and Rule (“CPLR”) allows a party to “move for judgment dismissing one or more causes of action asserted against him on the ground that … the court has not jurisdiction of the person of the defendant.” Whether the court has personal jurisdiction over a non-domiciliary involves a two-part inquiry: (1) the exercise of jurisdiction must be permissible under New York’s long-arm statute; and (2) the exercise of jurisd

Query: does the recipient of an assignment via a contract or a note automatically have the right to assert tort claims, including fraud claims, arising from that contract or note? In SureFire Dividend Capture, LP v. Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Financial Services LLC , 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 02841 (1st Dept. May 25, 2023) ( here ), the Appellate Division, First Department answered the question in the negative. The reason, as one would expect, depends on the language used

By: Jeffrey Haber Commercial contracts typically include a liquidated damages provision that allows for the payment of a predetermined amount of damages in the event of a breach by one of the parties. Courts will sustain such a provision if the liquidated amount is reasonably proportionate to the probable loss and the amount of actual loss is incapable or difficult of precise estimation. If, however, the amount fixed is grossly disproportionate to the probable loss, then the

By Jonathan H. Freiberger The question of when parties must close title on a real estate transaction is often answered by another question – has either party sent a “time of the essence” letter? [Eds. Note: this Blog has previously addressed “time of the essence” letters < here =">here</a>"> .] The law is settled that when “a contract for the sale of real property does not make time of the essence, the law permits a reasonable time in which to tender performance, regardless

By: Jeffrey M. Haber This Blog has previously written about the benefits of forming a corporation or a limited liability corporation and the perils of ignoring the corporate formalities that are attendant thereto ( see , e.g. , here , here , here , here , and here ). In today’s article, we examine the alleged use of the corporate entity to commit a wrong on another and the court’s unwillingness to pierce the corporate veil to hold the owner personally liable for that wrongful

By: Jeffrey M. Haber To plead a fraud cause of action, a plaintiff must allege: (1) a misrepresentation of material fact; (2) falsity; (3) scienter; (4) justifiable reliance; and (5) damages. 1 Each element of the claim must be satisfied for the plaintiff to prevail on the cause of action. The failure to satisfy each element will result in dismissal of the claim. In Hayes v. Martinez , 2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 02587 (1st Dept. May 11, 2023) ( here ), the Appellate Division, First

By Jonathan H. Freiberger This Blog has previously discussed issues related to whether a binding agreement (a settlement agreement or otherwise) was formed by parties to a dispute. See, e.g. , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . In our prior articles we discussed, inter alia , the elements of contract formation and whether emails suffice to satisfy signing requirements. Such issues were releva