top of page
All Posts
Enforcement News: Investment Advisor Settles “Greenwashing” Charges Concerning The percentage of Assets Under Management that Integrated ESG factors in Investment Decisions
By: Jeffrey M. Haber On November 8, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) announced ( here ) that it settled charges against Invesco Advisers, Inc., which operates Invesco mutual funds and has approximately $746 billion in assets under management, for making misleading statements about the percentage of company-wide assets under management (“AUM”) that integrated environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors in investment decisions. Acco
admin
Nov 11, 20244 min read
Pursuant to RPL 282(1), Attorney’s Fees Are Available to Borrowers In Mortgage Foreclosure Actions If They Know How to Ask For Them
By: Jonathan H. Freiberger As discussed in a prior BLOG article , one of the first questions asked by a potential client when consulting about a new litigation matter is “can we recoup our legal fees in the litigation.” In response, we must explain that, according to the “American Rule,” “the prevailing litigant is ordinarily not entitled to collect a reasonable attorney fee from the loser.” Alyeska Pipeline Services Co. v. Wilderness Society , 421 U.S. 240, 247 (1975) (provi
admin
Nov 8, 20245 min read
Freiberger Haber’s Co-Founding Partners Recognized by Super Lawyers Magazine®
Freiberger Haber LLP is pleased to announce that co-founding partners, Jonathan H. Freiberger and Jeffrey M. Haber, have been named by Super Lawyers Magazine® to be among the top lawyers in the New York metropolitan area. This is Mr. Freiberger’s fifth, and Mr. Haber’s thirteenth, consecutive year of selection. Both Messrs. Freiberger and Haber were recognized for their work in business litigation . Super Lawyers Magazine® is an affiliate of Thomson Reuters. It recognizes att
admin
Nov 6, 20242 min read
Contract Interpretation: Contracts Are To Be Construed in Accordance With The Parties’ Intent
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Under New York law, written agreements are construed in accordance with the parties’ intent. “The best evidence of what parties to a written agreement intend is what they say in their writing.” As such, “a written agreement that is complete, clear and unambiguous on its face must be enforced according to the plain meaning of its terms.” “Courts may not ‘by construction add or excise terms, nor distort the meaning of those used and thereby make a new con
admin
Nov 4, 20246 min read
The Appellate Division, Second Department, Holds that Banking Law 6-l is a Personal Defense that Can Only be asserted by the Borrower
By: Jonathan H. Freiberger As readers of this BLOG know, we frequently write about issues relating to mortgage foreclosure. We have also written numerous articles relating to the recently enacted FAPA. See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . Today’s BLOG article relates to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Edwards , a case decided by the Appellate Division, Second Department, on October 30, 202
admin
Nov 1, 20244 min read
A Primer on The Components of Personal Jurisdiction
By: Jeffrey M. Haber In Emirates Islamic Bank PJSC v. NeoPharma LLC , 2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 51461(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Oct. 4, 2024) ( here ), Justice Gerald Lebovits addressed an interesting question concerning personal jurisdiction against them that caught our eye. The jurisdictional issue in Emirates Islamic Bank concerned whether personal jurisdiction over the defendants was necessary in order to enforce a foreign-country judgment through a CPLR 3213 motion. To exerci
admin
Oct 30, 20246 min read
The Appellate Division, Third Department, Holds that the Six-Year Statute of Limitations to Commence an Action to Foreclose a Reverse Mortgage Accrues at the Time of Death of the Borrower
By: Jonathan H. Freiberger Today’s BLOG article relates to Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Miglucci , a mortgage foreclosure action decided by the Appellate Division, Third Department, on October 17, 2024. The Court in Miglucci determined that the accrual date of a cause of action for the foreclosure of a reverse mortgage generally accrues upon the death of the borrower. In 2008, the Miglucci borrower borrowed money from the lender and secured her repayment obligations
admin
Oct 28, 20244 min read
The Appellate Division, Third Department, Holds that Retroactive Application of the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (“FAPA”) Does Not Violate Due Process
By: Jonathan H. Freiberger As readers of this BLOG know, we frequently write about issues relating to mortgage foreclosure. We have also written numerous articles relating to the recently enacted FAPA. See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> . Today’s BLOG article relates to U.S. Bank National Association v. Lynch , a case decided by the Appellate Division, Third Department, on October 24, 2024, and in which it
admin
Oct 25, 20245 min read
Thorny Issues Concerning the Statute of Limitations for Declaratory Relief and Breach of Fiduciary Duty
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Statutes of limitations limit the time within which a defendant can be held liable for any type of alleged wrongdoing. Plaintiffs who do not pursue their rights within the limitations period will find the courthouse doors closed to their claims. For this reason, whether the statute of limitations has run is an important issue to consider before commencing an action. Important to this consideration is ascertaining when the claim sought to be asserted accru
admin
Oct 23, 20247 min read
bottom of page
