The Owner and the Surety moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them. The Lienor opposed the motions and cross-moved for summary judgment.

July 23, 2025) (here), the Appellate Division, Second Department reversed, in part, a judgment entered petition, confirmed the arbitration award, denied Bowne’s cross-motion, and directed the entry of a judgment A judgment dated August 7, 2023, was entered upon the order in favor of Centurion and against Bowne in

the plaintiff in that action, regardless of intent, if the defendant failed to satisfy a resulting judgment Marcus & Cinelli LLP Patterson Belknap involved the enforcement of a judgment against non-party Barbara In 2013, plaintiff obtained a judgment against Stewart for more than $2 million arising from legal services Stewart with a restraining notice prohibiting her from selling or transferring any property until the judgment Plaintiff’s judgment against Stewart has never been paid. 

prosecute the lien (Lien Law § 19(3)); by filing with the county clerk a copy of a transcript of a judgment undertaking in an amount equal to one hundred ten percent of such lien conditioned for the payment of any judgment

The motion court granted summary judgment to the lender and cancelled the satisfaction.  The lender again moved for summary judgment and submitted evidence that the satisfaction was mistakenly contest the admissibility of the business records submitted by the in support of its motion for summary judgment

  “ nce a mortgage debt is accelerated, the borrowers’ right and obligation to make monthly installments In January of 2018, a default judgment was entered against Grimes.  Thereafter, MLB moved for summary judgment and for an order of reference.  Perfect opposed MLB’s summary judgment motion and cross-moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR RPAPL 1301(3) provides that “ hile the action is pending or after final judgment for the plaintiff therein

Plaintiff moved for summary judgment on its breach of contract and declaratory judgment claims and on required, and whether they were adequately performed, raised factual issues that precluded summary judgment

When the defendant took steps to terminate the lease, the plaintiff commenced a declaratory judgment The defendant, landlord, moved for summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff had no rights under In so doing, the Court stated: Here, the plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment

The lender and borrower moved for summary judgment and the motion court granted the lender’s motion and Thereafter, the borrower filed numerous motions, both before and after a judgment of foreclosure and

agreements controls a dispute, see our discussion in Contract Ambiguity Defeats Dismissal of Declaratory Judgment

to execute on the judgment were unsuccessful before it can commence a foreclosure action.  against borrower, but never attempted to execute on the judgment).  Lender moved for summary judgment and borrower cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the action Assignor moved for summary judgment and borrower cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint Lender moved for summary judgment and borrower cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint

the person’s interest by the parties is or may be inadequate and the person is or may be bound by the judgment The Court of Appeals has explained that intervention is available only where the judgement will bind agreement, trespass, tortious interference with contract, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, declaratory judgement As such, the intervenors were required to show that they would be adversely affected by a judgment in they were not necessary to the action, they could not show that they would be adversely affected by a judgment