Search Results

, New York properties (the “Brooklyn Properties”) caused by Super Storm Sandy in October 2012 (the “Loss Following the Loss, the plaintiffs (a group of associated partnerships, corporations, limited liability Travelers denied coverage for the Loss on the grounds that the properties were located in National Flood failed to obtain flood coverage for the properties despite a specific request to do so prior to the Loss These policies included commercial general liability, property coverage, loss of rental income, boiler

and alleges she suffered “spinal and traumatic brain injuries resulting in cognitive deficits, memory loss information that ‘contradicts or conflicts with plaintiff’s alleged restrictions, disabilities, and losses

In that regard, PPP alleged that it “lost key market opportunities”, sustained “reputational harm because Under New York law, damages are not pleaded with particularity if the plaintiff fails to allege the causal

when the inevitable occurs, and the supply of new money stops, the scheme collapses, and investors lose As noted by the SEC, the greater the potential return from an investment, the greater one’s risk of losing

In the less frequent case, the misrepresentation of fact is made to a third party that relied on the

The entity owner does not have an individual claim, even if the entity owner loses the value of his/her

After the promoters profit from their sales, the stock price drops and the remaining investors lose money The tweets allegedly caused investors to lose more than $1.5 million.

A] plaintiff who ceases to be a shareholder, whether by reason of a merger or for any other reason, loses

Defendant claimed that, as a favor to her boss, she assisted his brother’s company, defendant AF, to

expressed” about these settlements – they “rarely yield genuine benefits for stockholders and threaten the loss Other jurisdictions have applied a less hostile approach to disclosure-only settlements. Though less exacting than the Delaware materiality standard, Justice Kornreich explained that Gordon’ The second, less obvious reason is that there is a cost to the shareholders if, in fact, management concealed disclosure violations ( i.e. , it is not a galactic release), there is no reason the shareholders should lose

Although Plaintiff retired with less than five years of service, the District paid her medical benefits Superintendent Donovan that the District would provide her with lifetime medical benefits even though she had less Chow further testified that Plaintiff was not a vested employee because she had less than five years To obtain such benefits with less than the required minimum, an employee needed a waiver of the requirement evidence … that the Board of Education knew that plaintiff was being treated as vested even though she had less

ingredients and try to avoid products containing artificial flavoring, which they view as potentially less