top of page

Search Results

797 results found for "park doctrine"

  • Court Holds That Disputes Between Members are Not Sufficient to Dissolve an LLC

    The Brothers operated a parking lot, as well as a flea market, on the three lots. The parking lot and the flea market are the only sources of income for Corner and Mall. The parking lot is a cash business. The parking lot is open five days a week, all year round except for snow days. In early 2017, Nissim charged Avraham with under-reporting the number of vehicles utilizing the parking

  • Timing is Everything – CPLR 205(a), CPLR 205-A and FAPA

    Patella, 279 A.D.2d 604, 605 (2nd Dep’t 2001) citations and internal quotation marks and brackets omitted [Citations, internal quotation marks and brackets omitted.] Jonathan H.

  • Line of Credit Agreement Is Not Considered A Promissory Note And, Therefore, Creates Standing Issues in Mortgage Foreclosure Action

    County of Albany , 3 N.Y.3d 475, 479 (2004) (citations, internal quotation marks and brackets omitted Accordingly, the question of whether a plaintiff has standing is “is a threshold determination, resting in part (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.)

  • Fraud Allegations Dismissed Due To Bankruptcy Non-Disclosure

    Once a debtor files for bankruptcy, all assets, including potential legal claims, become part of the Castro, 196 A.D.3d 680, 682 (2d Dept. 2021) (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted), and citing Howell Co., LLC, 193 A.D.3d 822, 823 (2d Dep. 2021) (alteration and internal quotation marks omitted)

  • As a Matter of Equity, Hearing Court/Referee was Required to Calculate the Amounts Due in Mortgage Foreclosure Action

    judgment of foreclosure and sale to include as the amount due, the amount the parties stipulated to as part Bank N.A. v Losner, 145 AD3d at 938 [internal quotation marks omitted]).

  • Second Department Addresses the Presumption of Receipt of a Properly Mailed Letter in the Context of a RPAPL 1304 Notice

    an affirmative defense, the foreclosing lender must demonstrate its compliance with the statute as part (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.)  (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.)  (Citations and internal quotation marks omitted.) (Citations and internal quotation marks and brackets omitted.) 

  • “All Foreclosure Sales Not Final”

    of Christ Calvary Parish , 24 A.D.3d 476, 477 (2 nd Dep’t 2005) (citations and internal quotation marks Altshuler , 129 A.D.3d at 1442 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). 

  • Second Department Finds That Merchant Agreement Is A Criminally Usurious Loan

    Adar Bays, 37 N.Y.3d at 331 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).  Geddes Savings and Loan Ass’n. , 63 N.Y.2d 254, 262 (1984) (citations, internal quotation marks and brackets (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted.)

  • Sometimes The Facts Are Just Not On Your Side

    because of the indisputable fact that Denise was not Salvatore’s legally married spouse during any part because of the indisputable fact that Denise was not Salvatore’s legally married spouse during any part The Court also found that under the “continuous duty doctrine,” Salvatore was liable for Fund payments Any possible misunderstanding on Mattesi’s part as to Denise’s spousal connection or non-connection to Salvatore – even in the face of the Judgment of Divorce – not play any role in wresting any part of

  • Arbitration and the “Direct Benefits Theory of Estoppel”

    Sacharow , 91 N.Y.2d 39, 49 (1997) (citations and quotation marks omitted). Id . Holdings Inc. , 21 N.Y.3d 626, 631 (2013) (adopting the doctrine from federal law and citing federal Under this doctrine, “a nonsignatory may be compelled to arbitrate where the nonsignatory ‘knowingly

  • Remote Work Sufficed to Invoke Personal Jurisdiction

    On appeal, the Fourth Department modified the order by granting the motion in part and dismissing the Although defendant never physically entered New York as part of her relationship with plaintiff, she Rudzewicz , 471 U.S. 462, 475 (1985) (internal quotation marks omitted); see generally LaMarca v. Pak-Mor Mfg. Co. , 95 N.Y.2d 210, 216-217 (2000). See Sager v. Walker , 490 F.3d 239, 251 (2d Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks omitted), and citing Centrifugal

  • Out-Of-Pocket Damages, Intent to Deceive and The Business Judgment Rule

    speculative.” 8 To determine whether the plaintiff sustained out-of-pocket losses, courts employ a two-part Note: “The business judgment rule is a common-law doctrine by which courts exercise restraint and defer Peebles offer.” 22 The Court rejected the ADC defendants’ argument that any fraudulent intent on their part Corp. , 75 N.Y.2d 530, 538 (1990) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

bottom of page