top of page
Commercial Litigation
Breach of Contract and the Faithless Servant Doctrine
Today, we examine Two Rivers Entities, LLC v. Sandoval , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 01527 (1st Dept. Mar. 16, 2021) ( here ), a case involving breach of contract and the faithless servant doctrine. Before we examine Two Rivers , we discuss the principles of law at issue in the case. Breach of Contract To sustain a breach of contract cause of action, a plaintiff must allege: (1) a valid agreement; (2) the plaintiff’s performance of its obligations under the agreement; (3) the defenda
admin
Mar 17, 20217 min read
Disclaimer of Liability and No Reliance on Representation Clauses Revisited
It has long been the law in New York that a party’s disclaimer of reliance on extra-contractual representations and omissions will not preclude a fraudulent inducement claim unless: (1) the disclaimer is specific to the fact alleged to be misrepresented or omitted; and (2) the alleged misrepresentation or omission does not concern facts peculiarly within the knowledge of the non-moving party. Basis Yield Alpha Fund v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. , 115 A.D.3d 128, 137 (1st Dept
admin
Mar 15, 20214 min read
SECOND DEPARTMENT UPHOLDS DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIMS AND PRECLUSION OF CERTAIN EVIDENCE AS A SANCTION PURSUANT TO CPLR 3126 FOR DISCOVERY ABUSES
Disclosure in New York State court litigation is governed by Article 31 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules . In general, there “shall be full disclosure of all matters material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action, regardless of burden of proof….” CPLR 3101. “The words, ‘material and necessary,’ are … to be interpreted liberally to require disclosure, upon request, of any facts bearing on the controversy which will assist preparation for trial by shar
admin
Mar 12, 20214 min read
Fraud Complaint That Seeks Damages Different From Contract Found Not To be Duplicative of Contract Claim
In the past, this Blog has examined cases in which the plaintiff brings a breach of contract claim and fraud claim in the same proceeding. < e.g. , here,=">here</a>," and="and" >here.=">here</a>."> e.g.,> Those cases show that where the two claims arise from the same facts and circumstances and seek the same relief, the fraud claim will be dismissed as duplicative of the contract claim. Indeed, as this Blog has explained previously, New York courts will not permit a fraud c
admin
Mar 10, 20216 min read
Promissory Notes and Summary Judgment in Lieu of A Complaint
“Summary judgment is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party without a full trial.” ( Here .) The motion is designed to avoid unnecessary trials – that is, its purpose is to avoid a trial where there are no material issues of fact to be decided by the trier of fact ( e.g. , the judge or the jury). Summary judgment motions can also simplify a trial (known as a motion for partial summary judgment) because it can dispense with issues or claims for w
admin
Mar 8, 20218 min read
The Saving Provisions of CPLR 205(a)
Many times, the applicable statute of limitations expires during the pendency of an already commenced action. No problem – right?, While generally speaking such an occurrence should not be a problem, issues may arise when an otherwise timely action is dismissed subsequent to the expiration of the limitations period. Depending on the nature of the dismissal, a plaintiff may be permitted to commence a new action notwithstanding the expiration of the applicable statute of lim
admin
Mar 5, 20216 min read
Fraud and the Effort to Obtain an E-2 Visa
“You can’t have fraud if you disclose it,” said the motion court in Ibarrondo v. Evans , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op 30051(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Jan. 6, 2020) ( here ), aff’d , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 01200 (1st Dept. Feb. 25, 2021) ( here ). Yet, without alleging any new facts detailing how the alleged fraud was not disclosed, the plaintiff in Ibarrondo sought to amend her complaint to reallege the cause of action. In today’s article, we examine Ibarrondo . Ibarrondo involved a dispu
admin
Mar 1, 20215 min read
“Can I Sue ‘em For My Legal Fees?”
Frequently, the first question asked by a potential client when consulting about a new litigation matter is “can we sue them for our legal fees.” Clients are often dismayed to learn that attorney’s fees are not generally recoverable in litigation under the “American Rule,” because “ n the United States, the prevailing litigant is ordinarily not entitled to collect a reasonable attorney fee from the loser.” Alyeska Pipeline Services Co. v. Wilderness Society , 421 U.S. 240,
admin
Feb 26, 20215 min read
Sometimes The Facts Are Just Not On Your Side
As the title of this article suggests, there are times in litigation where the facts simply do not support a claim or defense advanced by one or more of the parties. That was the case in Alston v. Golfo , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 30471(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Feb. 17, 2021) ( here ). Alston was commenced by a labor union welfare fund (the “Fund”) in July 2018 against one of its enrollees, Salvatore Golfo (“Salvatore”), and his former wife, defendant Denise Golfo (“Denise”), for
admin
Feb 24, 20216 min read
The Purchase of Andy Warhol’s “Uncle Sam” Screen Print Edition 1/5 and The Dispute That Followed
In today’s article, we examine familiar territory: complaints alleging breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. Kleber v. 10012 Holdings Inc. , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 30441(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Feb. 8, 2021) ( here ). As the title of the article indicates, Kleber involved the purchase of an “Uncle Sam” screen print edition 1/5 by Andy Warhol (the “Artwork”), which was signed and numbered by the artist. In April 2019, Plaintiff Claus Kleber and Defendant Guy Hepner (“He
admin
Feb 22, 20216 min read
The New York Court Of Appeals Decides Four Cases, In One Opinion, Addressing And Clarifying Issues Related To The Timeliness Of The Commencement Of Mortgage Foreclosure Actions
This BLOG has written extensively on issues related to residential mortgage foreclosure actions. Indeed, earlier this month, in “ PRETEXTUAL DE-ACCELERATION OF MORTGAGE DEBT ”, this BLOG provided an overview of the applicable statute of limitations in foreclosure, the calculation of the commencement thereof, and the acceleration and de-acceleration of mortgage debt. The Departments of the Appellate Divisions were not in agreement on some of these related issues and, accordi
admin
Feb 20, 202115 min read
The Actionability of Corporate Puffery and Statements of Opinion
“We make premium widgets with the highest quality metals.” Assume for the moment, the widgets are made from alloys that are prone to imperfections. Also assume that the speaker sincerely believed the statement to be true, notwithstanding the instances of imperfections. Is this statement an actionable fraud? In Matter of Sundial Growers, Inc. Sec. Litig. , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 01014 (1st Dept.Feb. 16, 2021) ( here ), the Court considered this question and, as discussed below, he
admin
Feb 17, 20219 min read
THE FIRST DEPARTMENT PERMITS AN ACCOUNTING OF THE PAYOFF AMOUNT DELIVERED TO THE LENDER AT CLOSING WHEN THE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO A MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE ACTION IS SOLD BY BORROWER PRIOR TO A REFEREE ...
his BLOG has addressed too may issues regarding residential mortgages to mention. A mortgage foreclosure action “is equitable in nature and triggers the equitable powers of the court … nce equity is invoked, the court’s power is as broad as equity and justice require.” U.S. Bank Nat. Assoc. Losner , 145 A.D.3d 935, 937-38 (2 nd Dep’t 2016) (numerous citations and internal quotation marks omitted). For example, due to the equitable nature of mortgage foreclosure actions, “
admin
Feb 12, 20214 min read
Court Finds No “At-Issue” Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege in Complex Note Transaction Case
It is well settled that communications between an attorney and a client for the purpose of obtaining legal advice are privileged and not discoverable unless the privilege is deemed to have been waived by the client. Veras Inv. Partners, LLC v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP , 52 A.D.3d 370, 374 (1st Dept. 2008) (citing Jakobleff v. Cerrato, Sweeney & Cohn , 97 A.D.2d 834, 835 (2d Dept. 1983)). A client who voluntarily testifies to a privileged matter, who publicly disclo
admin
Feb 10, 20215 min read
Related Entities Not “Necessary” to Pending Litigation For Intervention Purposes
Last month, this Blog examined Shilon v. New Upreal LLC , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 30146(U) (Sup. Ct., Kings County Jan. 11, 2021), a case involving a motion by a nonparty to intervene in the litigation. ( Here .) Today, we look at 1467 Bedford Holdings LLC v. Spitzer , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 30302(U) (Sup. Ct., Kings County Feb. 1, 2021) ( here ), a case involving intervention as of right under CPLR §1012(a)(2). Under CPLR §1012(a)(2), a party may intervene as a matter of right “when
admin
Feb 8, 20213 min read
PRETEXTUAL DE-ACCELERATION OF MORTGAGE DEBT
Freedom=">Freedom" Mortgage="Mortgage" Corp.="Corp." v.="v." Engel,="Engel</a>," in="in" which="which" it,="it," inter="<u>inter" alia ,="alia</u>," expressly="expressly" rejected="rejected" “pretextual="“pretextual" de-acceleration”="de-acceleration”" theory. ="theory. " This="This" BLOG’s="BLOG’s" treatment="treatment" Freedom ="<u>Freedom</u>" can="can" be="be" found="found" > here .="><em>here</em></a>."> This Blog has written extensively on issues related to residen
admin
Feb 5, 20215 min read
THE COVID-19 EMERGENCY EVICTION AND FORECLOSURE PREVENTION ACT OF 2020 (EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 28, 2020) PROVIDES SIGNIFICANT PROTECTIONS TO, AMONG OTHERS, RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGORS SUFFERING FINANCIAL HA...
In late December 2020, Governor Cuomo signed into law the “COVID-19 Emergency Eviction and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2020” (the “Act”), which has an effective date of December 28, 2020. While the Act covers certain residential eviction proceedings and tax lien foreclosures too, this BLOG will focus on the provisions of the Act that relate to residential mortgage foreclosures. A copy of the bookmarked December 31, 2020, memorandum from Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence
admin
Jan 29, 20214 min read
Conveyance to Extinguish an Antecedent Debt Held Not to Be Fraudulent Under (Old) DCL § 273-a
DCL § 273-a (conveyances by defendants) provides that a conveyance made without fair consideration by a defendant in an action for money damages is fraudulent as to the plaintiff in that action, regardless of intent, if the defendant fails to satisfy a resulting judgment in the action. Fair consideration encompasses two components: “whether the amount given for the transferred property was a ‘fair equivalent’ or not ‘disproportionately small’” and “whether the transaction ma
admin
Jan 27, 20214 min read
Intervention Permitted Where Questions of Law and Fact are Shared with A Party in A Pending Litigation
A client calls up an attorney and describes a situation in which two parties are litigating an issue that the client maintains she has interest in. She wants to be sure that her interests are not adversely affected by the outcome of that litigation. She asks the lawyer what she can do. The answer (for purposes of today’s article): intervene in the action. Intervention is a procedure by which a nonparty may join a pending litigation. In New York, intervention is governed by CP
admin
Jan 25, 20214 min read
THE APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, ADDRESSES BUYER’S SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE CLAIM UNDER A REAL ESTATE CONTRACT IN THE FACE OF SELLER’S INABILITY TO CONVEY GOOD TITLE
In one of our BLOGS from last week, we addressed the remedy of specific performance in breached real estate contracts < HERE =">HERE</a>"> . The BLOG noted that, under certain circumstances when monetary damages are insufficient to make one of the parties whole after a breach, the equitable remedy of specific performance may be available to require the breaching party to perform. On January 20, 2021, the Appellate Division, Second Department, decided W Equities Acquisitions
admin
Jan 22, 20215 min read
bottom of page
