top of page
All Posts
Deutsche Bank Employees Granted Class Certification in 401(k) Lawsuit
On September 5, 2017, Judge Lorna G. Schofield of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York certified a class of Deutsche Bank employees who had filed an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), alleging self-dealing in the company’s retirement plan – the Deutsche Bank Matched Savings Plan (the “Plan”). In particular, the Plaintiffs alleged that Deutsche Bank and the other defendants violated their fiduciary duties by l
admin
Sep 25, 20176 min read
Court Finds Oral Waiver Of Arbitration Clause Is Enforceable
It has long been the policy in New York to favor and encourage arbitration as a means of expediting the resolution of disputes and conserving judicial resources. Rio Algom Inc. v. Sammi Steel Co., Ltd. , 168 A.D.2d 250, 251 (1st Dept. 1990). For this reason, when parties have chosen arbitration as their forum for dispute resolution, they are precluded “from using the courts as a vehicle to protract litigation.” Matter of Weinrott (Carp) , 32 N.Y.2d 190, 199 (1973). Notwithst
admin
Sep 22, 20174 min read
Fraud Alert: Risk Of Fraud Significant In The Wake Of Hurricanes Harvey And Irma
It’s an unfortunate fact of life that victims of natural disasters, such as Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, and those who try to help them, often become the targets of fraud. As the floodwaters recede and the clean-up effort begins, officials have sounded the alarm, warning victims and volunteers about this threat. On September 4, 2017, Corey Amundson (“Amundson”), the Acting United States Attorney for the Middle District of Louisiana and head of the National Center for Disaster
admin
Sep 20, 20174 min read
Holy Escheat
Black’s Law Dictionary has defined “escheat” as “ reversion of property to the state in consequence of a want of any individual competent to inherit.” Many people are aware that money in forgotten bank accounts is frequently deemed abandoned and is escheated to the State, however, the scope of the APL, is significantly broader. New York’s Abandoned Property Law (“APL”), sets forth various circumstances in which property is deemed to be abandoned and thus escheated to New Y
admin
Sep 18, 20176 min read
Plaintiff Fails To Submit Evidence Supporting The Return Of Funds In Money Had And Received Case
The claim of assumpsit (from the Latin indebitatus assumpsit ) was “developed to redress circumstances involving unjust enrichment or to ‘prevent a man from retaining the money of, or some benefit derived from, another which it is against conscience that he should keep.’” Tri-State Chem., Inc. v. Western Organics, Inc. , 83 S.W.3d 189, 193-94 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 2002, pet. denied) (citation omitted); Parsa v. State of New York , 64 N.Y.2d 143, 148 (1984). “It encompassed an o
admin
Sep 15, 20175 min read
Financial Exploitation Of Seniors And Vulnerable Adults Continues To Be A Growing Concern
In prior posts, this Blog has written about the financial exploitation and abuse of vulnerable adults. ( Here , here and here .) Late last month, CNBC ran a story about this growing and disturbing problem. ( Here .) Financial exploitation of the elderly and vulnerable is a common occurrence. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, financial exploitation of senior adults is one of the most frequently reported forms of elder abuse. Indeed, a recent survey from the North
admin
Sep 13, 20174 min read
Radio Sports Talk Show Host And An Investment Adviser In The Crosshairs Of The Sec For Perpetrating Ponzi Schemes
Ponzi schemes seem to be in vogue lately. Last week the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and the Department of Justice, announced the filing of two enforcement and criminal proceedings involving Ponzi schemes ( here and here ), one involving New York sports radio personality, Craig Carton, and the other involving a New Jersey-based tax preparer and investment adviser. Both are charged with bilking investors out of millions of dollars. What is a Ponzi Scheme? Named
admin
Sep 11, 20175 min read
Court Holds No Breach Of Implied Covenant Of Good Faith And Fair Dealing Where Defendant Does Not Thwart The Performance Of The Contract
Implicit in every contract is a covenant of good faith and fair dealing. New York Univ. v. Continental Ins. Co. , 87 N.Y.2d 308, 318 (1995). “The covenant is breached where one party to a contract seeks to prevent its performance by, or to withhold its benefits from, the other.” Michaan v. Gazebo Hort., Inc. , 117 A.D.3d 692, 693 (2d Dept. 2014) (citation and quotation omitted). “While the duties of good faith and fair dealing do not imply obligations inconsistent with other
admin
Sep 5, 20175 min read
Issues Of Fact Preclude Dismissal Of Claim For Judicial Dissolution Of LLC
Previously, this Blog considered the rules for judicial dissolution of a limited liability company (“LLC”). Here . A brief reminder follows below. Under Section 702 of New York’s Limited Liability Company Law (“LLCL”), a court sitting in the judicial district in which the office of the company is located may dissolve the company “whenever it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the articles of organization or operating agreement.” LLCL §
admin
Sep 1, 20175 min read
Jonathan Freiberger, Jeffrey Haber Launch New Firm Serving Litigation, Counseling Needs of Businesses, Individuals
Melville, NY ( Law Firm Newswire ) August 31, 2017 - Freiberger Haber LLP to leverage more than 50 years of combined experience in delivering results oriented, client-centric representation to corporations, small businesses, partnerships and individuals. Jonathan Freiberger and Jeffrey Haber, former partners at prominent New York law firms, have come together to launch Freiberger Haber LLP . The new law firm will represent businesses and individuals involved in a broad ran
admin
Sep 1, 20173 min read
Troubles Continue to Mount for Wells Fargo & Co.
In July, this Blog wrote about the settlement in connection with Wells Fargo & Co.’s phony accounts scandal that will require the bank to pay millions of dollars to aggrieved customers. Now, Wells Fargo has disclosed in a regulatory filing that the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau ("CFPB") is investigating whether the bank incorrectly closed real accounts and left customers without access to their funds. CFPB Probes Wells Fargo Account Closures The CFPB probe was commenced
admin
Aug 30, 20172 min read
Pension Funds Sue Big Banks Over Stock Lending Abuses
The hits keep coming for money center banks, such as Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase and others, as three U.S. pension funds have filed a class action lawsuit over alleged stock lending abuses. The suit, brought by the Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System, Orange County Employees’ Retirement System, and Sonoma County Employees’ Retirement Association, claims the banks’ stock lending practices violate federal antitrust laws. The funds allege that the banks colluded to boyco
admin
Aug 28, 20172 min read
Former Customer Bets On The Wrong Business Deal
When disputes arise over the meaning of a contract or a clause within a contract, courts are called upon to interpret the agreement to give it meaning. Courts in textualist jurisdictions will examine the language of the contract as whole – the “four corners rule” – rather than the disputed clause in isolation. And, when the contract is clear, unambiguous and fully integrated ( i.e. , the parties have integrated their agreement into a single writing), all prior negotiations an
admin
Aug 25, 20177 min read
Relator Receives Over $9 Million For Blowing The Whistle On Mortgage Fraud
On August 8, 2017, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced a nearly $75 million settlement with PHH Mortgage Corporation (NYSE: Symbol PHH) and PHH Home Loans (collectively, “PHH”) to resolve allegations that PHH violated the False Claims Act by knowingly originating and underwriting mortgage loans insured by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (“HUD”) Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), guaranteed by the United States Department of Veterans A
admin
Aug 23, 20174 min read
Court Excludes Parol Evidence Where Contract Is Complete, Clear And Unambiguous
The foundation of virtually every business and commercial transaction is a contract. Indeed, it is hard to imagine any transaction for the purchase or sale of goods, the merger or acquisition of a business, or the provision of services that is not founded upon a contract. There is almost nothing more frustrating, or potentially costlier, to businesses and commercial practitioners than a dispute over the meaning of a contract. Such disputes often arise over the performance or
admin
Aug 21, 20175 min read
A Spike in Federal Class Action Securities Fraud Cases in 2017
According to the latest report from Cornerstone Research, which it jointly prepared with the Stanford Securities Class Action Clearinghouse, titled “Securities Class Action Filings – 2017 Mid-Year Assessment,” securities class action lawsuits hit a record pace during the first 6 months of 2017. (The press release announcing the issuance of the Report can be found here .) By the end of June 2017, plaintiffs filed 226 securities fraud class actions in federal court, more tha
admin
Aug 18, 20173 min read
Merger Clause Found Sufficient To Bar Fraud Claim By Sophisticated Plaintiff
As a general matter, when parties negotiate an agreement in a clear and unambiguous document, their writing will be enforced according to its terms. Evidence outside the four corners of the document as to what the parties really intended ( i.e. , parole evidence) is generally inadmissible. Golden Gate Yacht Club v. Societe Nautique De Geneve , 12 N.Y.3d 248 (2009). Among the reasons for this rule is to give “stability to commercial transactions,” and other types of commercial
admin
Aug 16, 20179 min read
Court Rules That Law Banning Robocalls Is Not Unconstitutional Despite Being Content Based
Robocalls. We all get them. They are annoying. But, are they legal? Not surprisingly, the answer depends on the circumstances involved. In 1991, Congress passed the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) to protect consumers from businesses that use automatic telephone dialing systems to deliver prerecorded messages without prior consent. Mims v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC , 565 U.S. 368, 370-71 (2012) (noting that the TCPA was enacted in response to “ oluminous consumer c
admin
Aug 14, 20176 min read
bottom of page
