Robocalls. We all get them. They are annoying. But, are they legal? Not surprisingly, the answer depends on the circumstances involved. In 1991, Congress passed the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) to protect consumers from businesses that use automatic telephone dialing systems to deliver prerecorded messages without prior consent. Mims v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC , 565 U.S. 368, 370-71 (2012) (noting that the TCPA was enacted in response to “ oluminous consumer c

As this Blog has noted in a previous post ( here ), to state a retaliation claim, both the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”) and the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”) require plaintiffs to demonstrate, among other things, that they engaged in protected whistleblowing activity, that their employer knew they engaged in protected activity, and that there was a causal connection between the protected activity and an adverse employme

In business, relationships are important. One relationship that is essential to successful businesses is the principal-agent relationship. A principal-agent relationship may be established by evidence of the consent of one person to allow another to act on his or her behalf and subject to his or her control, and consent by the other to act, even where the agent is acting as a volunteer. 5015 Art Fin. Partners, LLC v. Christie’s Inc. , 58 A.D.3d 469, 471 (1st Dept. 2009) (quo

On July 10, 2017, new Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules went into effect that permit companies, regardless of their size, to file paperwork for initial public offerings without immediately making public disclosures. The SEC's announcement of the new policy can be found here . "This is an important step in our efforts to foster capital formation, provide investment opportunities, and protect investors," said Director of the Division of Corporation Finance, B

Notice and reporting requirements in public contracts are common in public works projects. They provide public agencies with timely notice of deviations from budgeted expenditures or of any supposed malfeasance, and allow them to take early steps to avoid extra or unnecessary expense, make any necessary adjustments, mitigate damages and avoid the waste of public funds. A.H.A. Gen. Constr. v. New York City Hous. Auth. , 92 N.Y.2d 20, 33-34 (1998). Such provisions are importan

It is well settled that “ very contract imposes upon each party a duty of good faith and fair dealing in its performance and its enforcement.” Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 205 (1981). See also 511 W 232nd Owners Corp. v Jennifer Realty Co. , 98 N.Y.2d 144, 153 (2002) (“In New York, all contracts imply a covenant of good faith and fair dealing in the course of performance”). “This covenant embraces a pledge that neither party shall do anything which will have the effect

Prejudgment attachment is a provisional remedy that provides a plaintiff with a statutory mechanism by which he/she can secure a defendant’s assets during the pendency of a lawsuit. In effect, an order of attachment is a lien against a defendant’s property. As such, a prejudgment order of attachment increases the likelihood of recovery on a later-obtained judgment in the action. The requirements for obtaining a prejudgment attachment order vary from state to state; there is

No one likes to read fine print or lengthy agreements. Anyone buying insurance, for example, knows this to be so. In fact, a 2016 car insurance TV commercial by Liberty Mutual highlights this point. In the ad, the actress talks about an insurance policy that is over 20 pages long that no one reads, except for lawyers. The question becomes, then, does a failure to read an insurance policy bar a claim against an insurance company or broker for failing to obtain insurance believ

Earlier this month, Judge Richard J. Sullivan of the Southern District of New York dismissed a federal claim at the plaintiffs’ request, despite the defendants’ argument that the plaintiffs were “clearly and intentionally attempting to engage in forum manipulation.” In Nix v. Office of The Commissioner of Baseball, D/B/A Major League Baseball , Judge Sullivan found that while the plaintiffs’ “manifest purpose” was “to defeat federal jurisdiction” it was not the only factor t

Although courts will pierce the corporate veil “to prevent fraud or achieve equity,” Morris v. N.Y. State Department of Taxation & Finance , 82 N.Y.2d 135, 140 (1993) (quoting Int’l Aircraft Trading Co. v. Mfrs. Trust Co. , 297 N.Y. 285, 292 (1948)), they are, nevertheless, reluctant to disregard the corporate form. TNS Holdings Inc. v. MKI Sec. Corp. , 92 N.Y.2d 335, 339 (1998). After all, the purpose of incorporating is to allow individuals to avoid personal liability. See

A federal judge has given Well Fargo & Co. preliminary approval of its proposed $142 million class-action settlement to compensate millions of customers swept up in the fake account scandal that led to the ouster of CEO John Stumpf in October 2016. Current Wells Fargo Chief Executive Tim Sloan said in a statement that the proposed settlement represents "a major milestone in our efforts to make things right for our customers." The Wells Fargo Scandal The scandal broke in 201

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has released a highly anticipated rule that bars banks and credit card companies from using arbitration clauses to prevent customers from joining class action lawsuits. The rule was initially proposed by CFPB Director Richard Cordray last year and is slated to go into effect in eight months. Currently, mandatory arbitration clauses are used in an array of financial products and the rule applies to new agreements for credit card

On July 13, 2017, Charlotte-based LPL Financial, the largest retail investment advisory firm and independent broker-dealer in the United States, announced that it planned to provide its advisers with a new mutual fund platform early next year to improve the way its advisors offer mutual funds in brokerage accounts with participating fund companies, reduce fees for investors and standardize adviser compensation. “With this platform, LPL is striving to preserve choice for inve

Under Section 10 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), a party can vacate or modify an arbitral award under four narrow circumstances: “(1) where the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or undue means; (2) where there was evident partiality or corruption…; (3) where the arbitrators were guilty of misconduct … or of any other misbehavior by which the rights of any party have been prejudiced; or (4) where the arbitrators exceeded their powers ….” 9 U.S.C. §10(a). These

On June 26, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, in a 5-4 decision, that the three-year statute of repose in Section 13 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act” or the “’33 Act”) is not subject to equitable tolling under American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah , 414 U.S. 538 (1974). California Public Employees’ Retirement Sys. v. ANZ Sec., Inc. , No. 16-373 (U.S.) ( here ). Background ANZ Securities arose from the demise of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman”)

On June 27, 2017, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider whether state courts retain concurrent jurisdiction over lawsuits brought under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “’33 Act” or the “Securities Act”), or whether the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”) pre-empts them from considering such cases. ( Here .) Resolution of the issue will address a concern for issuers, underwriters and others involved in initial public offerings (“IPOs”) –

On Monday, June 26, 2017, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider whether the anti-retaliation provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank Act” or the “Act”) extends to individuals who have not reported alleged misconduct to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and, thereby, fall outside the Act’s definition of “whistleblower.” Digital Realty Trust v. Somers , 16-1276. In Digital Realty Trust v. Somers

As noted in a prior Blog post ( here ), the Labor Department's fiduciary rule, at least the first phase of the rule, has gone into effect, though its future remains uncertain. On June 9, 2017, two provisions of the rule, which requires financial advisers and other investment professionals to act in the best interest of their clients and to disclose any potential conflicts of interest when providing retirement advice, became effective. One expands the definition of who is a fi