top of page
Business Law
Enforcement News: SEC Amends Whistleblower Program to Incentivize Whistleblowing
By: Jeffrey M. Haber On August 26, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) announced ( here ) that it adopted two amendments to the rules governing its whistleblower program. The first rule change allows the Commission to pay whistleblowers for their information and assistance in connection with non-SEC actions in certain circumstances. The second rule affirms the Commission’s authority to consider the dollar amount of a potential award for the l
admin
Sep 6, 20223 min read
Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Refuses Lender’s Request to Stay a Foreclosure Action Pending the Court of Appeals’ Decision in Bank of America, N.A. v. Kessler
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Regular readers of this Blog are familiar with Bank of America, N.A. v. Kessler , 202 A.D.3d 10 (2021)(“ Kessler ”), a case about which we have previously written < here ,=">here</a>," here=">here</a>"> and which addresses the pre-foreclosure notice requirements of RPAPL 1304 (a topic that is a frequent subject of this Blog – see < here =">here</a>"> and the articles linked therein). Briefly, as noted in prior Blog articles, RPAPL 1304 requires
admin
Sep 5, 20225 min read
COVID-19 and The Doctrines of Frustration of Purpose and Impossibility -- Revisited
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Previously, this Blog examined the doctrines of frustration of purpose and impossibility of performance in the context of Covid-19 ( here and here ). The doctrine of frustration of purpose is narrowly applied. 1 “In order to invoke the doctrine of frustration of purpose, the frustrated purpose must be so completely the basis of the contract that, as both parties understood, without it, the transaction would have made little sense.” 2 In other words, t
admin
Jun 17, 20226 min read
A Fraud That is Collateral to The Contract and Not Barred By The Merger Clause
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Over the years, this Blog has examined numerous cases (indeed, too many to link to) in which the plaintiff claims to have been fraudulently induced to enter into a contract with the defendant. Most of the cases were dismissed because the plaintiff failed to allege a misrepresentation of present fact, as opposed to a misrepresentation of future intent to perform under the contract. Today, we examine, International Business Machines Corp. v. GlobalFoundries
admin
Apr 11, 20226 min read
Enforcement News: With Friends Like These …
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has frequently brought enforcement actions against those who trade upon material, non-public information. Many of these actions show that insider trading extends beyond the employees of the subject company. In those enforcement actions, an employee of the company shares material, non-public information with a third party, typically a family member or friend, who thereafter trades on the information or shares
admin
Apr 4, 20225 min read
Update: Broad Releases and The Duplication Doctrine
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Last April, this Blog wrote about Sodhi v. IAC/InterActiveCorp , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 31220(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Apr. 8, 2021) ( here ), an action to recover money claimed to be improperly withheld by IAC/Interacticecorp (“IAC”). The primary issue in the Sodhi was whether the releases in a settlement letter covered the claims asserted in the action. The motion court held that the releases were broad and covered plaintiffs’ claim to the money alleged
admin
Jan 10, 20223 min read
Follow-up: Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Engel
By Jonathan H. Freiberger In its February 20, 2021, article entitled: “ The New York Court of Appeals Decides Four Cases, In One Opinion, Addressing and Clarifying Issues Related to the Timeliness of the Commencement of Mortgage Foreclosure Actions ” (the “Prior Article”), this Blog discussed, Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Engel , 37 N.Y.3d 1 (2021), a February 18, 2021, decision by the New York Court of Appeals. In Freedom , the Court of Appeals decided four cases “each turning
admin
Oct 22, 20214 min read
Enforcement News: The SEC Giveth and The SEC Taketh Away
By: Jeffrey M. Haber The SEC Giveth In our last article (posted on September 17, 2021 ( here )) discussing the SEC’s whistleblower program, we noted that the Commission has paid more than $1 billion in awards to hundreds of whistleblowers since issuing its first award in 2012. In the month that followed, the amount paid to whistleblowers increased by more than $87 million. The first award of $11.5 million (announced on September 17, 2021, here ) was paid to two whistleblower
admin
Oct 20, 20214 min read
Freiberger Haber’s Co-Founding Partners Once Again Recognized By Super Lawyers Magazine
Melville, NY ( Law Firm Newswire ) October 15, 2021 - Freiberger Haber LLP is pleased to announce that co-founding partners, Jonathan H. Freiberger and Jeffrey M. Haber, have been named by Super Lawyers magazine to be among the top lawyers in the New York metropolitan area. This is Mr. Freiberger’s second, and Mr. Haber’s tenth, consecutive year of selection. Both Messrs. Freiberger and Haber were recognized for their work in business litigation. Super Lawyers Magazine® is a
admin
Oct 18, 20212 min read
Fraud Notes: Misstatements of Material Fact and The Doctrine of Caveat Emptor
By Jeffrey M. Haber To state a claim for fraud, a plaintiff must satisfy each element of the claim; namely, “a material misrepresentation of fact, knowledge of its falsity, an intent to induce reliance, justifiable reliance by the plaintiff and damages.” 1 The failure to satisfy each element will result in dismissal of the claim. Such was the case in Dreamco Dev. Corp. v. Empire State Dev. Corp. , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 04792 (4th Dept. Aug. 26, 2021) ( here ), where plaintiff f
admin
Aug 30, 20216 min read
New York Court of Appeals Makes Clear That Consumer-Oriented Conduct Under GBL 349 Focuses on The Deceptive Act or Practice, Not on Use of the Product and Confirms That Specific Disclaimers Can Bar...
On June 3, 2021, the New York Court of Appeals, the State’s highest court, handed down Himmelstein, McConnell, Gribben, Donoghue & Joseph, LLP v Matthew Bender & Co., Inc. , 2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 03485 (June 3, 2021) ( here ), a decision involving a claim under General Business Law § 349 (“GBL § 349”), New York’s consumer fraud statute. In a decision written by Judge Jenny Rivera, a majority of the Court made two rulings that will have an impact on future claims under the statut
admin
Jun 6, 20218 min read
COVID-19 Update: New York Courts Reducing In-Court Operations and In-Person Traffic
It goes without saying that the spread of the coronavirus is accelerating across the country. As noted in the lead paragraph of an article posted in yesterday’s online version of the Washington Post, titled “U.S. Surpasses 15 million Coronavirus Cases as Spread Accelerates” ( here ): It took about 100 days for the United States to record its first 1 million coronavirus cases, and 44 more passed before the country topped 2 million. But now, in the middle of the most severe su
admin
Dec 9, 20204 min read
COVID-19 Update: New York Courts Preparing for A Surge in COVID Cases
Anyone reading the newspapers or watching television knows that in the past few weeks the country has seen a surge in new coronavirus cases. As reported in the news media ( e.g. , here ), “ ighteen states have broken daily records for new cases in the past week and hospitalizations are up in 43 states.” According to Johns Hopkins University, there are more than 9.2 million coronavirus cases and more than 231,000 deaths since the start of the pandemic. Recognizing the risks
admin
Nov 4, 20203 min read
FINRA Proposes Amendments to Rule 2165 to Further Combat Suspected Financial Exploitation of Seniors and Vulnerable Adults
As we have noted, the financial exploitation of seniors is a significant problem ( e.g. , here , here , here , here , and here ). For many regulators, it is a top priority. here.=">here</a>."> FINRA is one such regulator. To help combat the financial exploitation of seniors, FINRA enacted Rule 2165 (“Financial Exploitation of Specified Adults”) ( here ). Among other things, the rule permits a member firm to place a temporary hold on the disbursement of funds or securities fr
admin
Oct 12, 20204 min read
Court Dismisses Special Proceeding Because Petitioner Failed to Comply With Statutory Requirements
Last week, this Blog wrote about the ramifications of failing to meet a deadline or otherwise act in a timely manner ( here ). In today’s post, we examine the ramifications of failing to meet the procedural requirements set forth in a statute. In Lincoln Sq. Synagogue, Inc. v. Lexington Strategies, LLC , 2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 32793(U) (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County Aug. 26, 2020) ( here ), the Court dismissed a turnover proceeding against a garnishee because the judgment creditor failed
admin
Sep 2, 20204 min read
Employee-At-Will May Receive Commissions Earned During The Course Of Employment Says Fourth Department
Like most states in the country, New York is an “employment at will” state. This means that if there is no written agreement between the employer and employee governing when the employer can fire the employee, the employer has the right to fire the employee at any time for any reason. Smalley v. Dreyfus Corp. , 10 N.Y.3d 55, 58 (2008). The Court of Appeals has “repeatedly refused to recognize exceptions to, or pathways around, these principles.” Id. Thus, when an employee
admin
Aug 24, 20206 min read
COVID-19, The “New Normal” and the New York Court System
Last week, the New York State court system, which is following Governor Cuomo’s plan to reopen the economy on a regional, phased-in basis, resumed in-person court operations in 40 counties in the six regions meeting the public health benchmarks for economic reopening: the Finger Lakes, Mohawk Valley, Southern Tier, North Country, Central New York and Western New York regions. As of May 26, 2020, eight additional counties in the Capital Region restored in-person court operatio
admin
May 27, 20203 min read
Court Dismisses Shareholder Derivative Action Because Plaintiffs Failed To Allege Demand Futility Under Delaware Law
It is well settled, and understood, that “the business and affairs of every corporation are managed by a board of directors.” Stone ex. re. AmSouth Bancorp. v. Ritter , 911 A2d 362 (Del. 2006). By its very nature a derivative litigation “impinges on the managerial freedom” of the corporation’s directors. Id. “Therefore, the right of a stockholder to prosecute a derivative suit is limited to situations where either the stockholder has demanded the directors pursue a corporate
admin
Apr 22, 20207 min read
Jeffrey M. Haber, Co-Founding Partner of Freiberger Haber LLP, Discusses the Financial Exploitation of America’s Seniors and Vulnerable Adults on a Recent Podcast
As readers of this Blog know, we often write about the financial exploitation of America’s seniors and vulnerable adults. ( E.g. , here , here , here and here .) According to the U.S. Department of Justice, financial exploitation of senior adults is one of the most frequently reported forms of elder abuse. Indeed, a recent survey from the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”) found that three in 10 state securities regulators had reported an increa
admin
Mar 12, 20202 min read
Enforcement News: SEC Charges Consultant with Operating a Long-Running Ponzi-Like Scheme That Raised At Least $75 Million from Hundreds of Investors
Ponzi schemes remain a familiar and unfortunate risk for investors. Because Ponzi schemes purport to offer high returns with little or no risk, and rely on inflated credentials of a financial professional, investors are attracted to the investment products these scammers offer. The most notorious Ponzi scheme in recent years was perpetrated by Bernie Madoff. In 2016, there were 59 Ponzi schemes uncovered in the United States, with losses totaling $2.4 billion, according to th
admin
Jan 20, 20203 min read
bottom of page
