top of page
All Posts
First Department Holds Alleged Fraud Invalidates Amendment to ByLaws Requiring Exclusive Jurisdiction in Delaware
By: Jeffrey M. Haber New York courts favor the enforcement of forum selection clauses. They do so because they provide certainty and predictability in the resolution of disputes. here=">here</a>" and="and" >here.=">here</a>."> A forum selection clause is “prima facie valid and enforceable unless it is shown by the challenging party to be unreasonable, unjust, in contravention of public policy, invalid due to fraud or overreaching.” Because a forum selection clause is “prima
admin
Apr 27, 20227 min read
Fraud in the Execution
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Since inception of this Blog, we have written about many types of fraud, such as affinity fraud, common law fraud, fraud in the inducement, fraudulent concealment, and securities fraud. Until today, we have not directly examined fraud in the execution. 1 Fraud in the execution, or fraud in the factum, arises where a party did not know the nature or the contents of the document being signed, or the consequences of signing it, and was nonetheless misled i
admin
Apr 25, 20225 min read
Second Department Decides an Issue of “First Appellate Impression” Related to the Sufficiency of an RPAPL 1304 Notice in a Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Action
By Jonathan H. Freiberger The readers of this Blog know that we frequently discuss numerous aspects of residential mortgage litigation. S ee, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> and the articles linked therein. A related subtopic that gets much attention in this Blog is the pre-foreclosure notice requirements of RPAPL 1304 . See, e.g., < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> , < here =
admin
Apr 22, 20227 min read
Settlement Agreement With Installment Payment Plan Held to Be An Instrument For The Payment of Money Only
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Under well-settled principles, summary judgment in lieu of complaint is available for an instrument for the payment of money only. In considering such a motion, the courts will look at the four corners of the instrument sued upon in determining whether the instrument qualifies as one for the payment of money only. See, e.g. ,="3213. <em>See</em>, <em>e.g.</em>," here, here and here.=">here</a>."> Most cases under CPLR § 3213 involve promissor
admin
Apr 20, 20223 min read
Enforcement News: SEC Brings Emergency Action Against Alleged Perpetrators of an Affinity Fraud and a Ponzi Scheme
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Affinity fraud is a type of securities fraud in which the promoter of the fraud preys upon members of an identifiable group, such as a religious or ethnic community, the elderly, or a professional group. The promoter of an affinity fraud frequently is – or pretends to be – a member or a good friend of the group. The promoter often enlists respected members of the community or religious leaders from within the group to disseminate information about the sch
admin
Apr 19, 20224 min read
First Department Rules on the Applicability of Personal Guaranties in the Context of a Residential Lease
By Jonathan H. Freiberger Personal guaranties are contracts of suretyship pursuant to which “one party as surety binds himself to the second party as creditor to pay a debt contracted by a third party either immediately upon default of the third party or after attempts to effect collection from the third party have failed.” General Phoenix Corp. v. Cabot , 300 N.Y. 87, 92 (1949). As to when the surety’s obligation arises: hether a surety is a guarantor of payment or a guara
admin
Apr 15, 20224 min read
Federal Preemption: The FAA Trumps GBL 399-c’s Prohibition of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Mandatory arbitration has been around for a long time. It is a mechanism used by, among others, businesses to require consumers to arbitrate their disputes rather than litigate their claims in a court of law. Although in theory a consumer can opt-out of the arbitration requirement, in reality to do so would mean that he or she would not obtain the product or service. For example, a person cannot buy something online, subscribe to a service, or join a club
admin
Apr 13, 20228 min read
A Fraud That is Collateral to The Contract and Not Barred By The Merger Clause
By: Jeffrey M. Haber Over the years, this Blog has examined numerous cases (indeed, too many to link to) in which the plaintiff claims to have been fraudulently induced to enter into a contract with the defendant. Most of the cases were dismissed because the plaintiff failed to allege a misrepresentation of present fact, as opposed to a misrepresentation of future intent to perform under the contract. Today, we examine, International Business Machines Corp. v. GlobalFoundries
admin
Apr 11, 20226 min read
Second Department Decides Two Cases Under RPAPL 1301
By Jonathan H. Freiberger As noted in several of this Blog’s previous articles < here =">here</a>"> , < here =">here</a>"> and < here =">here</a>"> , when an individual or entity borrows money from a lender, the repayment obligation is typically evidenced by a promissory note. To secure the borrower’s repayment obligations, lenders generally request some form of collateral. When the collateral is an interest in real property, the borrower generally delivers a mortgage to t
admin
Apr 8, 20225 min read
bottom of page
